PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN TINGKAT MINERAL (PREMIX) PADA PAKAN BERBASIS PROBIOTIK TERHADAP KONSUMSI PAKAN, HEN DAY PRODUCTION, DAN KONVERSI PAKAN PADA AYAM PETELUR
| Main Author: | Efendi, Kevin |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52565/43/PENDAHULUAN%20.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52565/2/BAB%20I.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52565/3/BAB%20II.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52565/44/BAB%20III.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52565/5/BAB%20IV.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52565/6/BAB%20V.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52565/7/LAMPIRAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52565/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This research was conducted on 23 January - 23 February 2019 at the laying hens farm Jl. Krueng Aceh, Gogolatar Village, Talun District, Blitar Regency and Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Laboratory, Department of Animal Husbandry, Animal Husbandry Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Malang. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of giving mineral levels on feed based on probiotics on feed consumption, Hen Day Production, and feed conversion The material used was 1 year old laying hens as many as 60 types of Dekalb Brown. Feed ingredients consist of corn, 43.75%, class A rice separator (separator) 25%, factory concentrate feed 31.25%. This study uses an experimental method using a completely randomized design with 6 treatments 5 replications. The treatment of this study is as follows P0: control (0% Mineral, 0% Probiotic) P1: feed + 2% probiotics + 0% mineral, P2: feed + 2% probiotics + 1% mineral, P3: feed + 2% probiotics + 2% mineral, P4: feed + 2% probiotics + 3% minerals, P5 = feed + 0% probiotics + 2% minerals. The data was then analyzed using Variance Analysis (ANAVA) and if it was significantly affected, it was continued with the Duncan test. The results of the variance analysis showed no significant effect (P˃0.05) on feed consumption and feed conversion. While the hen day production results of the analysis of variance showed a significant effect (P <0.05). The best treatment result was P2 in 97.8%.