LIMITASI KEWENANGAN MAJELIS PENGAWAS NOTARIS DAERAH KOTA PALEMBANG DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK YANG DILAKUKAN NOTARIS (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PN PALEMBANG NOMOR 27/PDT.G/2013/PN.PLG)
Daftar Isi:
- This study aims to determine the background and the Authority of Notary Supervisory Board of Palembang City Region In Handling of Code of Ethic Violations Conducted by Notary. This is very interesting to be studied because in the case taken from the Decision of Palembang City Court Number 27 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.PLG, the Regional Supervisory Board of Palembang City held an ethical trial resulting from a violation of the code of ethics of PPAT which should be the authority of the PPAT Supervisory Board. This type of research is normative legal research using literature study and interviews to obtain data. The method used in the literature approach is used to analyze the various laws and regulations related to the Regional Supervisory Board in carrying out its authority, while the approach of direct field interview is used to collect primary data available in the community on the form of implementation of the Authority of the Regional Supervisory Board of Palembang City and by linking the applicable legal norms by establishing resource persons based on established criteria. The resourches in this study involved the Supervisory Board of Palembang City. The result of this study states that the Authority of Supervisory Board based on UUJN only handled violation of UUJN itself, when violation of notary code of ethics, based on Article 12 of the Articles of Association of Indonesian Notaries, is the authority of Notary Board of Honor, although in exercising its authority Honorary Council can coordinate with the Supervisory Assembly but the implementation of its ethical hearing remains the authority of the Council of Honor. If the violation of the code of ethics of PPAT then based on Article 33 Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 becomes the authority of the PPAT Honorary Board. In the case of the Case in the court decision Number 27 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.PLG, there was a violation of the code of ethics conducted by PPAT against the Deed of Sale and Purchase it made, but the general public who in this case became the disadvantaged party by PPAT reported it to the Regional Supervisory Board of Palembang City, then the Regional Supervisory Board of Palembang still holds an ethical session which should not be the authority, but the authority of the PPAT Honorary Council and the result of the ethical session is even used as the basis of Court Decision.