Daftar Isi:
  • This study discusses the making of marriage agreement after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015. This was normative research, with the type and source of research material from secondary data, analyzed qualitatively, with deductive conclusion techniques. It was found that the legal consequences of making marriage agreement after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 are marriage agreement can be made after the marriage is carried out, the approval can be made by a Notary, effective from the date of the agreement, may be revoked, third parties will get difficulties for the claim of loss if the marriage agreement that has been ratified by the Marriage Register or Notary is not recorded or registered in the KUA or KCS. The role of the Notary in the making of marriage agreements after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 isto ensure that the couple who made the marriage agreement deed includes a list of assets acquired during marriage and made a statement that the assets has never been transacted in any way. After the marriage agreement deed was made, the Notary provides legal counseling for the couple (husband and wife) and third parties to submit application to the District Court instructing the KCS or KUA to record and register it for protection and legal certainty of third parties. Implementation of the making of marriage agreements after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015; in theMalang District Court Decision Number 599 / Pdt.P / 2017 / PN.Ml, the marriage agreement ofthe applicants are established within the period of the marriage transition to be registered by KCS as legal basis.