Can We Reinvent International Studies on Southeast Asia for the Post Western World?
| Main Author: | Sudarman, Suzie |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article info application/pdf Journal |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
Indonesian Association for International Relations
, 2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://journal.aihii.or.id/index.php/ijir/article/view/6 https://journal.aihii.or.id/index.php/ijir/article/view/6/6 |
| ctrlnum |
article-6 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">Can We Reinvent International Studies on Southeast Asia for the Post Western World?</title><creator>Sudarman, Suzie</creator><subject lang="en-US">international studies must transform</subject><subject lang="en-US">and understand the nature of violence</subject><subject lang="en-US">the type of markets that occurs and other realities in the non-Western world that affect global politics</subject><description lang="en-US">Since the end of the Cold War the Asia-Pacific region draws increased attention but there is a gap between the rich comparative and foreign policy scholarship on China, Japan, and the United States with the wider world of international relations theory. Although Pierre Lizee’s work, quoting Stanley Hoffmann, puts forward an argument that international studies as a discipline assumes that it speaks to the nature of politics throughout the entire world,1 it is evident that the study of Southeast Asia in particular, tends to be under-theorized.2 The images, concepts, and theories which underlie international studies as Hoffmann argued, must be recognized for what they are: product of the post-1945 era, when “to study United States foreign policy was to study the international system and to study the international system could not fail to bring one back to the role of the United States.”3</description><publisher lang="en-US">Indonesian Association for International Relations</publisher><date>2017-06-10</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Journal:Article</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>https://journal.aihii.or.id/index.php/ijir/article/view/6</identifier><identifier>10.32787/ijir.v1i1.6</identifier><source lang="en-US">Indonesian Journal of International Relations; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; 1-14</source><source lang="id-ID">Indonesian Journal of International Relations; Vol 1 No 1 (2017): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; 1-14</source><source>2548-4109</source><source>2657-165X</source><language>eng</language><relation>https://journal.aihii.or.id/index.php/ijir/article/view/6/6</relation><rights lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 Suzie Sudarman</rights><rights lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</rights><recordID>article-6</recordID></dc>
|
| language |
eng |
| format |
Journal:Article Journal Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Other File:application/pdf File Journal:Journal |
| author |
Sudarman, Suzie |
| title |
Can We Reinvent International Studies on Southeast Asia for the Post Western World? |
| publisher |
Indonesian Association for International Relations |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| topic |
international studies must transform and understand the nature of violence the type of markets that occurs and other realities in the non-Western world that affect global politics |
| url |
https://journal.aihii.or.id/index.php/ijir/article/view/6 https://journal.aihii.or.id/index.php/ijir/article/view/6/6 |
| contents |
Since the end of the Cold War the Asia-Pacific region draws increased attention but there is a gap between the rich comparative and foreign policy scholarship on China, Japan, and the United States with the wider world of international relations theory. Although Pierre Lizee’s work, quoting Stanley Hoffmann, puts forward an argument that international studies as a discipline assumes that it speaks to the nature of politics throughout the entire world,1 it is evident that the study of Southeast Asia in particular, tends to be under-theorized.2 The images, concepts, and theories which underlie international studies as Hoffmann argued, must be recognized for what they are: product of the post-1945 era, when “to study United States foreign policy was to study the international system and to study the international system could not fail to bring one back to the role of the United States.”3 |
| id |
IOS7194.article-6 |
| institution |
Asosias Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Indonesia |
| affiliation |
onesearch.perpusnas.go.id |
| institution_id |
3129 |
| institution_type |
library:special library |
| library |
Indonesian Journal of International Relations |
| library_id |
2413 |
| collection |
Indonesian Journal of International Relations |
| repository_id |
7194 |
| subject_area |
International Relations/Hubungan Internasional Political Institutions/Institusi Politik |
| city |
Jakarta |
| province |
DKI JAKARTA |
| shared_to_ipusnas_str |
1 |
| repoId |
IOS7194 |
| first_indexed |
2020-03-19T08:15:50Z |
| last_indexed |
2020-03-19T08:15:50Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| _version_ |
1686508023136124928 |
| score |
17.538404 |