Upaya hukum terhadap putusan verstek yang merugikan pihak ke-tiga
Daftar Isi:
- Every human in his life definitely has a problem with his neighbor. A problem should be solved, but sometimes people can not solve their own problems because each of them will not budge. With the presence of the court, it's very helpful every human that litigants, because the court considered as a party to mediate, neutral and the verdict considered equitable. The two sides who litigant have to respect the court, following the course of the trial according to the law. The easiest thing to respect the court is to attend the trial. For make both parties can respect the trial, then be made a rule that the judge can make a decision without the presence, which means that if the defendant is not present then the plaintiff will be won. Decision without the presence of is very fair, because to force every who litigant to respect the court. In giving the decision without the presence, the judge still must be thorough and careful in examining the evidence used by the plaintiffs to strengthen their argument. The verdict in the absence can cause loss to a third party who had not previously been litigating with the parties litigant before. Third parties will be harmed, if the verdict without the presence of will be immediately executed. Third parties are given the right to submit up resistance against the decision of absence opposition by a third party that to retain the right to be not executed.