PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TENTANG PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI BADAN PERMUSYAWARATAN DESA (BPD) DI DESA BABATAN ILIR KECAMATAN SEGINIM KABUPATEN BENGKULU SELATAN
| Main Author: | yadi, efri |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Archive |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://repository.unib.ac.id/12887/1/SKRIPSI%20EFRY%20YADI.pdf http://repository.unib.ac.id/12887/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Village Consultative Body (BPD) is a manifestation of democracy and institution degree, the government of village closest to the people. BPD is formed around the village in Indonesia that has been overshadowed by Law No. 22 1999 on Regional Government. With the establishment of this BPD can help or meet all the needs of local communities, in accordance with the function of BPD according to Law No. 6 2014 on Village Governance. The number of members of the BPD Babatan Ilir Village as many as five (5) persons. This study aimed to knew or thingking of the public about the implementation of the functions of the Village Consultative Body (BPD) in the village of Babatan Ilir. There was took from 3 aspect article of 55 Law 6 of 2014 on the village, namely: (1) Discuss and agree of planning about village Regulations, (2) Collect and Distribute Aspirations, (3) performance Monitoring chief of village. The population in this study is a whole community of Babatan Ilir village, samples were taken by 84 person with random of Sampling Samples election. The approach in this study using the quantitative descriptive statistical presentation using tables, diagrams, mean, median, standard deviation, then the calculation of the percentage in the presentation of the results questionnaires. From this study, concluded that the public perception of the function (1) discuss and pass the proposed laws the village is considered quite good, because the people included in the rulemaking village and delivered again people result of the village regulations, (2) shared their aspirations, received unfavorable responses 58,80% of the respondents can’t to answer, people do not fully understand the functions entailed by the BPD, so that in the process and share their aspirations often opposition or dissent with the community (3) supervising the performance of the chief. Rated quite poorly in the eyes of the public, only a small fraction of society to know what the duties of the BPD. Lack of human resources, lack of curiosity people about government or institutions that exist in their environment. The conclusion is 44.6% of people didn’t knew the meaning of the public perception of the implementation of the BPD function less well. There was still a lot of negative feedback of people to the performance of BPD.