Merger control based on anti-monopoly law in Indonesia: comparison in some Asean member states
| Main Author: | Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri |
|---|---|
| Format: | Proceeding PeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://libprint.trisakti.ac.id/1334/1/Prosiding_PKPU%20-%20AM%20Tri%20Anggraini%202017.pdf http://libprint.trisakti.ac.id/1334/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Merger control is one of the important aspects in the business competition regime, considering the impact of merger can lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. The purpose of merger control in the perspective of competition law is to prevent potential violations of anti-monopoly laws through corporate actions in the form of mergers or acquisitions. Business competition supervisory authority in Indonesia (KPPU) has a role in controlling mergers by defining criteria for mergers, such as notification systems, notification conditions, substantive tests and time periods, notification results, and other technical matters related to parties required to make notifications, foreign mergers and challenges. How does the system of merger control in Indonesia and its comparison with the system in other ASEAN Member States (AMS)? And how AMS synergize on regional merger control system, particularly in the ASEAN region? One of the most interesting things about the merger control system in Indonesia is using mandatory post merger notification, that can lead to a heavy penalty for late reporting. This merger control comparative study aims to know merger control regulations and system in the ASEAN region, particularly some AMS which had already promulgated its competition law. The merger control in the ASEAN economic region requires an initial step to form a harmonization of the system by the competition authority of the respective country.