The influence of different types of feedbacks on learners’ writing performance at higher education
| Main Author: | Sabarun, Sabarun |
|---|---|
| Format: | Proceeding PeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/2347/1/INACELT%202019%20SABARUN%20The%20influence%20of%20different%20types%20of%20feedbacks%20on%20learners%E2%80%99%20writing%20performance%20at%20higher%20education.pdf http://digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/2347/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This study examined the influence of different types of feedbacks on learners’ writing performance at higher education. The study belonged to a quasi-experimental research. The participants of the study were 65 L2 learners consisting of four different groups: focus direct feedback (FDF); unfocus direct feedback (UDF) ; focus indirect feedback (FIF); and unfocus indirect feedback (UIF). The data were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests. The study revealed that the mean rank for FDF was 25.76; UDF: 45.00; was 15.72; and UIF: 45.97. In this case, UIF (45.97) was higher than UDF (45.00). UDF (45.00) was higher than FDF ( 25.76). and FDF ( 25.76) was higher than FIF ( 15.72). It revealed that there was a difference on the means score among the four group. the value of Chi-Square was 29.949 and asymp.Sig. was 0.000. it meant that Chi-Square= 29.949; p<0.05. It was said that different types of feedbacks gave facilitative effect on the learners’ writing performance. Then, partially, based on the Mann Whitney U test, it revealed that there was a significance difference between FDF and UDF (p< 0.05), between FDF and FIF (p< 0.05), between FDF and UIF (p< 0.05), and between UDF and FIF p< 0.05). However, there was no significance difference between UDF and UIF (p>0.05). It was recommended that the teachers apply various types of feedback in the learning process by considering the learners’ level ability.