PENGEMBANGAN ON GOING ASSESMENT PADA MODEL ARGUMENT DRIVEN INQUIRY (ADI) DALAM MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI, BERPIKIR KRITIS, DAN KREATIF SISWA DITINJAU DARI PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN AKADEMIK DAN TIPE KEPRIBADIAN
| Main Author: | NOVI HARYANTI, 1823022009 |
|---|---|
| Format: | Masters NonPeerReviewed Book Report |
| Terbitan: |
, 2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://digilib.unila.ac.id/63284/1/ABSTRACT%20FULL.pdf http://digilib.unila.ac.id/63284/2/TESIS%20FULL%20Novi%20Haryanti.pdf http://digilib.unila.ac.id/63284/3/TESIS%20TANPA%20PEMBAHASAN%20NOVI%20HARYANTI.pdf http://digilib.unila.ac.id/63284/ |
Daftar Isi:
- ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan instrument on going assessment pada model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) yang valid, praktis, dan efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi, berpikir kritis dan kreatif siswa ditinjau dari perbedaan kemampuan akademik dan tipe kepribadian. Metode penelitian ini merupakan reaserch and development (R&D) yang diadaptasi dari Dick dan Carry, dengan langkah pengembangan yaitu analisis, desain, develop, evaluasi. Sumber data pengembangan ini adalah siswa dan guru SMA kelas XII di provinsi Lampung. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu kuisioner dan instrumen tes. Kevalidan on going assessment ditentukan dari hasil penilaian expert (dosen ahli) menggunakan lembar validasi, kepraktisan on going assessment ditentukan dari hasil analisis hasil lembar observasi keterlaksanaan on going assessment, keterlaksanaan sistem sosial dan prinsip reaksi dan keefektifan on going assessment ditentukan dari hasil analisis angket rspon siswa terhadap penerapan on going assessment. Berdasarkan implementasi diperoleh bahwa instrumen on going assessment pada model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi, berpikir kritis dan kreatif siswa ditinjau dari perbedaan kemampuan akademik dan tipe kepribadian memiliki nilai kevalidan instrumen sebesar 0,88; nilai kepraktisan instrumen sebesar 0,94; dan nilai efektifitas instrumen sebesar 0,34. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan produk on going assessment pada model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) ditinjau dari perbedaan kemampuan akademik dan tipe kepribadian, valid, praktis dan efektif. Kata Kunci : On going assessment, Argument-Driven Inquiry, Keterampilan Argumentasi, Berpikir kritis, Berpikir Kreatif. ABSTRACT : This study aims to describe the validity, practicality, and effectivity of on going assessment in the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model to improve students' argumentation, critical thinking and creative skills in terms of differences in academic abilities and personality types. This research method is a reaserch and development (R&D) adapted from Dick and Carry, with development steps namely analysis, design, develop, evaluation. The data source of this development is high school students and class XII teachers in Lampung province. The instruments used were questionnaires and test instruments. Validity of on going assessment is determined from the results of expert assessment using expert validation sheets, practicality on going assessment is determined from the results of the analysis of the results of the observation sheet on going assessment, the implementation of the social system and the principle of reaction and the effectivity of on going assessment is determined from the results of the questionnaire questionnaire analysis students towards the application of on going assessment. Based on the implementation it was found that the on going assessment instrument in the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model to improve students' argumentation, critical thinking and creative skills in terms of differences in academic abilities and personality types had an instrument validity value of 0.88; the practicality of the instrument is 0.94; and the effectiveness of the instrument is 0.34. Thus it can be concluded that the on going assessment product in the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model in terms of differences in academic abilities and personality types, valid, practical and effective. Keywords: On going assessment, Argument-Driven Inquiry, Argumentation Skills, Critical thinking, Creative thinking