ANALISIS USAHA PERDAGANGAN TEBU RAKYAT BEBAS(TRB) DI KECAMATAN BULULAWANG KABUPATEN MALANG
| Main Author: | ROHMAN, KHOIRUR |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/9874/1/ANALISIS_USAHA_PERDAGANGAN_TEBU_RAKYAT_BEBAS.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/9874/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Sugar Cane (Saccharum Officinarum L) is a seasonal plant which has its own attitude since it has sugar essence. Sugar cane included into weeds family (Graminae) just like rice, corn, bamboo, etc. In sugar cane system at Indonesia, there were two terms we often heard. They were manufacture sugar cane and society sugar cane. Society sugar cane has different system with the manufacture sugar cane, in society sugar cane, there were active trading components like marketing division and different distributing system which different with the manufacture sugar cane. This research directed to : 1) finding out the sugar cane trading volume along the grinding season in every marketing institutions ; 2) finding out the cost paid for sugar cane trading along grinding season in every marketing institutions ; 3) finding out income received in trading along grinding season in every marketing institution ; 4) finding out the profit comparison between all marketing institution. The research was done in purposive way, that was at Bululawang Sub-district Malang Residence in grinding season period 2006. Sampling was done by Snow ball sampling, that was by deciding respondent by tracking the distribution of thing sold, then found that the respondents were 16 people. Data collection were done by interview, questionnaire, and observation. Data analysis method used was cost analysis, income analysis, revenue analysis and t test analysis. Production was calculated by TC = FC + VC equation, revenue by TR = P x Q equation and income by π = TR – TC equation. According to the research, there found that the broker bought for 20.780kw, collection trader 43.035kw and big trader 172.427kw. The average cost of the broker was Rp.408.115.000,-, collection trader was Rp.972.484.567,-, and big trader was Rp.4.255.505.963,-. From the analysis of cost and revenue, there found that income by broker was Rp.935.002,-, collection trader was Rp.92.652.717,-, and big trader was Rp.259.985.739,-. Difference analysis by using t test with significance >0.05 showed tcount = -1.720 which means that the profit between broker and collection trader didn’t have real difference, then between broker and big trader there found tcount = 0.76 which mean that profit has no real different, between collection trader and big trader, there found tcount = -2.581 which mean that there were difference between average profit of collection trader with big trader.