ANALISIS RETRIBUSI PASAR TERHADAP PENINGKATAN PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH SEBELUM DAN SEUDAH OTONOMI DAERAH DI KABUPATEN LUMAJANG
| Main Author: | WAHYUNINGSIH, LIDI NUR |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/8355/1/ANALISIS_RETRIBUSI_PASAR_TERHADAP_PENINGKATANPENDAPATAN_ASLI_DAERAH_SEBELUM_DAN_SEUDAH_OTONOMIDAERAH_DI_KABUPATEN_LUMAJANG.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/8355/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This research is a case study on Dipenda Lumajang by title: Analysis of Market Charges Against Increasing Regional Income Before and After the Autonomous Region in Lumajang. The purpose of this study is to investigate the contribution of retribution market analysis before and after the regional autonomy of Revenue (PAD) in Lumajang, to determine the effectiveness of retribution market analysis before and after decentralization in Lumajang, to find out whether there are differences in the contribution analysis of market levies before and after regional autonomy on local revenues increased in Lumajang district, to find out whether there are differences in the level of effectiveness of retribution market analysis before and after decentralization in Lumajang. The calculation result with the contribution ratio of the average contribution of market levies before the regional autonomy of 9.25% and after the regional autonomy of 6.06%. While the level of effectiveness before the regional autonomy of 99.17% and 102.42% after the regional autonomy. The level difference of the market levy contributions before and after regional autonomy with the Wilcoxon test does not make any difference because the asymp siq (2 tailed)> 0.05 = 0.109> 0.05, whereas the difference in effectiveness of the levy rate market before and after the regional autonomy of the Wilcoxon test does not makes no difference because the value asymp siq (2 tailed)> 0.05 = 0.109> 0.05. From the results of the analysis can be in the know that the contribution of regional autonomy after the market levy has decreased but it can be said to be effective because of its effectiveness 1atau bias reaches 100%. While the statistical test results from different test well matched by contributions from market levies before and after the regional autonomy and the level of effectiveness before and after regional autonomy makes no difference because the asymp siq (2 tailed)> 0.05 = 0.109> 0.05. Based on the conclusions above, the writer may submit suggestions of the need for firm action in the implementation of compulsory levies sanctions on the market that do not obey the pay user charges, should improve its oversight, guidance and evaluation on a regular basis to levy collector officers, local government should provide a target to officers levy collector market every day how big the market levy that must be paid to local governments. If officers levy collector market can not meet the set target of local government should provide a tough sanctions provided by threatening fines, in determining regional income targets for retribution should be based on market factors and conditions affecting the market retribution, should add to the facilities and infrastructure in the market and curb the stalls and powder-powder is in the market, because the average used time series that uses 3-year period prior to regional autonomy and regional autonomy 3 years after it sought to increase the period of study so that more accurate results.