PERBANDINGAN PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PERZINAAN MENURUT HAPMIL Dengan KUHAP(Studi Kasus Di KUMDAM V BRAWIJAYA DAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MALANG)

Main Author: MAZHALIA, YUNIARA
Format: Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: , 2009
Subjects:
Online Access: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/8309/1/Perbandingan_Penyelesaian_Tindak_Pidana_Perzinaan_Menurut.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/8309/
Daftar Isi:
  • The Object Of Study In This Research Was The Comparison Of Criminal Act Solution, Adultery At HAPMIL (Case Study At Kumdam V Brawijaya) Soldier of TNI who did public criminal act will be judged at public law-court. This case will influence the existence of Military court, including the limit of jurisdiction of Military court. The purpose of this research were first, to know the comparison of criminal act solution, adultery between HAPMIL ( Undang-undang No. 31 Tahun 1997 about Military ) and second, to know and to describe the solution of criminal act, especially adultery which is happen in army field, Indonesia National Army (TNI-AD) at KUMDAM V BRAWIJAYA. The research methodology of this research was sociology juridical. The analytic descriptive method was describing the facts which are gain from the result of research place, documentary and another source from library then take the conclusion. The result of this research was there were some differences of criminal act solution, adultery at HAPMIL and KUHAP 1). KUHAP civil cases, they were ; a. The investigator was police and government clank. b. In KUHAP cases, there were criminal act addition “robbery” and “announcement of judge’s decisions”. d. To a suspect who’s his case will be judged by law court based on relative competency. 2). HAPMIL cases, they were: a. the investigator was ANKUM, PM, Oditur. b. The punishment for “occupation” at Military will be held in the place which is led by Military and focus on education not prison. c. Criminal act, charge did not find in Military court, but it doesn’t mean that a soldier is impossible get that punishment (charge). d. A suspect from the member of Military will be judged based on absolute competency at Military court