Cover Image

ANALISIS YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN HAKIM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (Studi di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Surabaya)

Main Author: TANZIL MULTAZAM , MUHAMMAD
Format: Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: , 2008
Subjects:
K Law (General)
Online Access: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/7364/1/Analisis_Yuridis_Sosiologis_Terhadap_Pelaksanaan_Putusan.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/7364/
ctrlnum 7364
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><relation>http://eprints.umm.ac.id/7364/</relation><title>ANALISIS YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN HAKIM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (Studi di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Surabaya) </title><creator>TANZIL MULTAZAM , MUHAMMAD</creator><subject>K Law (General)</subject><description>State Administration Judicature (PERATUN) conceptually can be defined as judicature institution that hearing state administration lawsuit, include official lawsuit between departments or officials of state administration with an individual or civil corporation caused by the produced State Administration Decision based on the in-effect law regulations. &#xD; The formulated problems are about how the implementation of PERATUN judge decision is and what factors hindering the implementation of PERATUN judge decision are. Those are to know the implementation of PERATUN judge decision and the hindering factors in implementing PERATUN judge decision. &#xD; This research uses sociological juridical method, based on the primary and secondary data sources with literature study and field study, That is interview and documentation of files related to the implementation of PERATUN judge decision and its hindering factors, as data collecting technique, to analyzed qualitative descriptively later. &#xD; The research results find that the implementation procedure of PERATUN judge decision in State Administration Court (PTUN) of Surabaya is still refers to Law number 5 year 1986. While, in its implementation during 2007 is found that there are 65 decisions, which have had law power, with 55 decisions has been implemented and 10 decisions has not been implemented yet by the accused. &#xD; The conclusion is that part of the implementation procedures of PERATUN judge decision of PTUN Surabaya is still referring to section 116 Law No. 5 year 1986. It is caused by there is no further regulation yet from Law No. 9 year 2004. That PTUN have no autonomous authority to control the implementation of decisions. The hindrance of its implementation is the less of understanding factor of litigant on the execution system on State Administration Court and the existence of authority conflict in accomplishing omission lawsuit of rights over land between PERATUN and BPN. &#xD; </description><date>2008</date><type>Thesis:Thesis</type><type>PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed</type><type>Book:Book</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.umm.ac.id/7364/1/Analisis_Yuridis_Sosiologis_Terhadap_Pelaksanaan_Putusan.pdf</identifier><identifier> TANZIL MULTAZAM , MUHAMMAD (2008) ANALISIS YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN HAKIM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (Studi di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Surabaya). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang. </identifier><recordID>7364</recordID></dc>
language eng
format Thesis:Thesis
Thesis
PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed
PeerReview
Book:Book
Book
author TANZIL MULTAZAM , MUHAMMAD
title ANALISIS YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN HAKIM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (Studi di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Surabaya)
publishDate 2008
topic K Law (General)
url http://eprints.umm.ac.id/7364/1/Analisis_Yuridis_Sosiologis_Terhadap_Pelaksanaan_Putusan.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/7364/
contents State Administration Judicature (PERATUN) conceptually can be defined as judicature institution that hearing state administration lawsuit, include official lawsuit between departments or officials of state administration with an individual or civil corporation caused by the produced State Administration Decision based on the in-effect law regulations. The formulated problems are about how the implementation of PERATUN judge decision is and what factors hindering the implementation of PERATUN judge decision are. Those are to know the implementation of PERATUN judge decision and the hindering factors in implementing PERATUN judge decision. This research uses sociological juridical method, based on the primary and secondary data sources with literature study and field study, That is interview and documentation of files related to the implementation of PERATUN judge decision and its hindering factors, as data collecting technique, to analyzed qualitative descriptively later. The research results find that the implementation procedure of PERATUN judge decision in State Administration Court (PTUN) of Surabaya is still refers to Law number 5 year 1986. While, in its implementation during 2007 is found that there are 65 decisions, which have had law power, with 55 decisions has been implemented and 10 decisions has not been implemented yet by the accused. The conclusion is that part of the implementation procedures of PERATUN judge decision of PTUN Surabaya is still referring to section 116 Law No. 5 year 1986. It is caused by there is no further regulation yet from Law No. 9 year 2004. That PTUN have no autonomous authority to control the implementation of decisions. The hindrance of its implementation is the less of understanding factor of litigant on the execution system on State Administration Court and the existence of authority conflict in accomplishing omission lawsuit of rights over land between PERATUN and BPN.
id IOS4109.7364
institution Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
institution_id 136
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
library_id 546
collection UMM Institutional Repository
repository_id 4109
city MALANG
province JAWA TIMUR
repoId IOS4109
first_indexed 2017-03-21T02:40:46Z
last_indexed 2017-03-21T02:40:46Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1675924132062035968
score 17.538404

Lihat Juga