ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI MALANG NO.555/PID.B/2006/PN.MLG DENGAN TERDAKWA RAHMAT YANUAR SEBAGAI ANAK YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN
| Main Author: | TAURISSIA, MERINA |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/7356/1/Analisis_Yuridis_Putusan_Hakim_Pengadilan_Negeri.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/7356/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Decision represent law product that made by judge, but in this time judge of district court decision crisis represent one of the basal area which get keen focus from various circle There are many decision judge which do not fulfill some aspect becoming the target of law that is rule of law aspect, justice aspect and aspect of benefit and also aspect of progressive. This matter indicate that Judge at a period of this time more is making account of self interest rather than society sense of justice. This writing use method approach of normative yuridis, materials punish primary that is Unlucky Decision Judge of district court copy No. 555/Pid.B/2006/PN.Mlg. Besides using Law for example Law Number 3 Year 1997 about Justice Of Child, Law Number 23 Year 2002 about Protection Of Child, Law No. 4 Year 1979 about Prosperity Of Child, Law No. 39 Year 1999 About Human Right, Convention Rights Child. Materials punish sekunder that used is books, literatures about other law articles and law. tertiary Law materials obtained from book, encyclopaedia, journal, dictionary, former research, public examination of justice decision and others.. In data collecting use bibliography method. Later; Then all the law materials analysed by content analysis or analysis fill that is seeing and analysing content in Decision Judge of a quo to some problems Its conclusion of judge decision of a quo in general not yet fulfilled all aspect becoming the target of law, good of rule of law aspect, justice aspect, aspect of kemanfaataan aspect and also of progresifitas because a lot of found by negligence and insuffiency of judge in making judge decision of a quo. But in formal rule of law aspect and judge decision benefit aspect of a quo can be told have fulfilled some of