KENDALA DAN UPAYA JAKSA DALAM MELAKSANAKAN PUTUSAN KASASI YANG TELAH MEMPEROLEH KEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP( Studi kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Tanah Grogot Kabupaten Paser Kalimantan Timur )
| Main Author: | WAHYUDI, DIAN |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/6884/1/Kendala_Dan_Upaya_Jaksa_Dalam_Melaksanakanputusan.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/6884/ |
Daftar Isi:
- In an appeal process, not all case needed the presence of defendant so that the Court of Law decision caused “law space” which was used by the defendant to get away from law line and escape. It made the prosecutor get trouble to implement the appeal verdict. It was interesting case in the writer’s opinion so that the writer eager to reveal what factors became the inhibition of the prosecutor in doing appeal verdict and also efforts to reveal the problems. In the research, the writer used socio-juridical approach. The writer’s location was State Public Prosecutor Office at Tanah Grogot Paser Residence East Kalimantan. In the research, the writer used interview, observation and documentation technique. In data analysis, the writer used qualitative descriptive data. The research showed that inhibitions in appeal investigation were : difficulty in finding runaway defendant after knowing that defendant would be punished, lack of the defendant consideration in his duty to accept the appeal verdict, un-supporting operational fund, people who covered the existence of defendant. The prosecutor’s efforts in facing the inhibition in appeal verdict were : called the defendant to do his duty, if the call letter was avoided, the prosecutor would sent the second and third letter. The prosecutor then report the court and police that defendant has been escape. By knowing factors inhibiting prosecutor’s duty in appeal investigation, there hoped that prosecutor office could set all cases done better. For the society understanding the criminal court punishment factor could be useful in facing a case in court. For another researcher, it would be good to do research related with another criminal law efforts.