Daftar Isi:
  • MUHAMMAD FAHMIL ISLAMI, 2019, 201410050311163, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Faculty of Sciences of Social and Science Politics, Program Study of Science Governance , Collaborative Governance in the development of Tourism village Keramat (Studies in Village Keramat in Sub Kasin District of Klojen Malang), Supervisor I: Drs . Krisno Hadi , MA, Advisor II: Dra . Su'adah M.Si . We need to know that the reason for the formation of this collaboration actually began with the celebration of thematic village event competitions in Malang. incidentally village shrine to get the champion 3, so that the sacred village gets a prize of 1 billion . after getting prizes are then fund tert e but used for the development of the village shrine is more advanced . in efforts to the development of the need to involve the private sector of which is Paint Company PT. Propan Raya Malang, Malang Creative Fusion Malang, Malang Indonesian Architecture Association , and UTERO Indonesia. By because it is from here that cooperation is formed . The theory that is used Collaborative Governance Ansell and Gash. Then the methodology that is used by the author is using the research descriptive qualitative , source of data used is primary and the secondary , then the technique of collecting data used is the data interviews , observation along with documentation . Subjects research who used purposive sampling to determine in directly informant that an expert in the study of this . Furthermore, is the result of research it is there are two program activities cooperation were successfully implemented on the the first construction of physical example museum, archway graveyard, pergola, garden, facilities street public and stand center for UKM, painting picture mural and manufacture of board branding and plan locations . Then the non- physical one is Product Marketing Training via the web. The results of the monev are from the technical side and the performance of the parties found no obstacles, and the development in Rt.07 is 100% realized . The conclusion is that physical and non- physical development in Rt.07 as a whole is 100% already done . Even the results of monitoring and evaluation are not found problems both in the technical and performance . Advice is a need to conduct further dissemination of tourism and socialization about how to market the tourist village shrine to the cyberspace so Public ready to run tourist village shrine . The second post development in Rt.07 needs to maintain communication between parties to be more solid in developing a sacred village