ANALISIS FAKTOR PENERAPAN PERILAKU HIDUP BERSIH DAN SEHAT (PHBS) TERHADAP PREVALENSI DEMAM BERDARAH DENGUE (DBD) DI PUSKESMAS MULYOREJO, KECAMATAN SUKUN KOTA MALANG
| Main Author: | Mulya, Cendra |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/9/PENDAHULUAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/1/BAB%201.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/2/BAB%202.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/3/BAB%203.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/4/BAB%204.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/10/BAB%205.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/6/BAB%206.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/7/BAB%207.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/40/Lampiran.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/56245/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Background: Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever is an infectious disease transmitted through mosquito bites. This disease is also the main cause of all ages death in Indonesia, however there are not much attention toward the disease. This is due to the low factor of the application of clean and healthy behavior. The application factors are: predisposing factor (knowledge level about DHF, environmental hygiene), enambling factor (the habit of hanging clothes, used clean water), reinforcing factor (information of 3M, public health services). Purpose: Analyzing influence of clean and healthy behavior application factors toward the prevalence of DHF patient in Mulyorejo’s Health Center Malang 2017. Method: This research included in observational analytic epidemiology draft with cross sectional design study. The sampling technique used in this research is purpossive sampling with a total of 181 people were obtained from Taro Yamane formula calculation. Analysis test used Lambda test and logistic regretion test. Result and discussion: From Lambda test obtained the result of predisposing factor is r=0,506, enambling factor is r=0,556, and reinforcing factor is r=0,506 which mean the correlation power is intermediate and the result of logistic regretion test for history of predisposing factor (OR: 52,776, 95% C.I : 11,177-249,199, p: 0,000), enambling factor (OR: 39,021, 95% C.I : 7,762-196,176, p: 0,000), reinforcing factor (OR: 9,782, 95% C.I : 3,442-27,804, p: 0,000). So the final result is all 3 factors have influence towards the prevalence of DHF and when upgraded will decreasing the prevalence of DHF. Conclusion: The most influenced factors toward DHF event toward the patient in Mulyorejo’s Health Center work area was predisposing factor about DHF. *: Teaching staff of Family Medicine and Work Safety **: Teaching staff of Anatomy