ANALISA YURIDIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 45/Pdt.G/PN.Mlg TENTANG PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM ANTARA MUSLIKIN DKK MELAWAN IMAM YASIR DKK DALAM PERKARA PEREBUTAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH

Main Author: SUSANTO, YUDI
Format: Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: , 2019
Subjects:
Online Access: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52570/25/pendahuluan.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52570/2/bab%201.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52570/3/bab%202.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52570/4/bab%203.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52570/5/bab%204.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52570/6/LAMPIRAN.pdf
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/52570/
Daftar Isi:
  • The land as a gift of God Almighty will always be needed by humans, therefore a legal rule is needed that can guarantee land rights to avoid disputes. One of the disputes over land rights is found in Decision Number.45 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Mlg which was decided by Nit Ontvankelijke Verklaard with consideration of Ne Bis In Idem which is considered to be detrimental to heirs due to loss of absolute rights to inheritance and receipt of grants This study is not in accordance with legitimate portie. This study uses the formulation of the problem of how judges consider in resolving disputes over land rights in Decision Number 45 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Mlg concerning acts against the law and where dispute resolution over land rights in Decision Number 45 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Mlg concerning actions in terms of justice and legal certainty. With the aim of the study to find out the judge's consideration in resolving disputes over land rights in Decision Number 45 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Mlg concerning acts against the law as well as to find out the dispute resolution of the dispute over land rights in Decision Number 45 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Mlg about actions in terms of justice and legal certainty. The method used is an empirical juridical approach, namely a method which in addition to seeing positive law also sees the application in the field through content analysis of the decision No.45 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Mlg. With the results of the judge's consideration in the decision in considering the defendant's claim to be inaccurate and meticulous, this is indicated by the lack of consideration of the judge about the lack of parties and disputed objects.