ANALISIS KOMPARATIF BIAYA DAN PENERIMAAN BUDIDAYA APEL (Malus syvestriss Mill) ANTARA PENGGUNA DAN NON PENGGUNA PUPUK ORGANIK “BIOGREEN” (Studi kasus di Desa Kayukebek Kecamatan Tutur Kabupaten Pasuruan)
| Main Author: | DWI AGUSTINING TYAS, SOVI |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/4872/1/ANALISIS_KOMPARATIF_BIAYA_DAN_PENERIMAAN_BUDIDAYA_APE1.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/4872/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Prospect development of usage of organic manure as penyeimbang of usage of manure of an-organik good enough (it) is true, considering these days price fertilize an-organik which continue to bounce up. Besides, usage of continuous organic manure can affect positive to.In general farmer of Indonesia specially farmer of apple exist in region of Pasuruan ( Nongkojajar) and its surroundings, representing farmer using manure of an-organik in course of its production. Nevertheless, there [is] also using organic manure ( organic manure [of] Biogreen) in addition from manure of an-organik. Besides usage of cage manure, farmer of apple [in] Countryside of Kayukebek also use organic manure [of] Biogreen.fertility of land;ground. From research which have been [done/conducted], indicating that there are some different expense [of] its its[his] big reality [among/between] farmer of consumer and non consumer of organic manure [of] biogreen. The costs for example Expense of pesticide, expense of manure of an organic [is] Expense of TK prapanen, expense of equipments, and total cost. Total cost which [is] dikelurkan farmer of consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen equal to Rp 12.095.924,31 during once production process. While total expense [of] farmer of[is non consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen equal to Rp 17.418.896,41. obtained [by] Mean production farmer of consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen counted 9.868,99 singk/ 750 tree, with price mean equal to 2.802 / singk. While farmer of[is non consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen produce mean which [is] diperolah counted 11.185,52 singk / 750 tree, at the price of mean 2.548,81 / singk. Become can be seen with usage of organic manure [of] yielded [to] Production Biogreen lower but quality of crop which [is] better diperolah, so that given price [is] higher the than farmer which [do] not use organic manure [of] Biogreen. Result of examination of hypothesis use test of t, pursuant to comparison [among/between] t [count/calculate] with t of[is tables of got [by] value of t [count/calculate] equal to - 1,001 , while t of[is tables of with trust level 5 % obtained [by] t of[is tables of equal to 1,676. Meaning value of t [count/calculate] < t of[is tables of , so that its conclusion [of] H0 accepted, hence acceptance mean accepted by farmer of consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen and farmer of[is non consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen [there] no difference of obtained acceptance There are some weakness and excellence of organic manure [of] Biogreen. Excellence of organic manure [of] Biogreen [is] earning memperingan of[is expense of, growth to good bydm soriyt and leaf, improve;repairing land;ground structure, its [of] cheap him etc, and also weakness of organic manure [of] Biogreen [is] respon to tardy crop, its aroma is not delicious, etc.