ANALISIS SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL AUDITOR TERHADAP PEMBERIAN OPINI AUDITOR (Studi Kasus KAP TR Malang)
| Main Author: | Wulandari, Sri |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/47215/1/PENDAHULUAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/47215/2/BAB%20I.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/47215/3/BAB%20II.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/47215/4/BAB%20III.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/47215/5/BAB%20IV.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/47215/6/BAB%20V.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/47215/7/LAMPIRAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/47215/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This research aims to find out what are the factors that influence the auditor's professional skepticism in giving audit opinions that are in accordance with what is happening. Case studies conducted on KAP TR in Malang using descriptive analysis are ways of analysis by describing or describing collected data as existence without making general valid conclusions or generalizations. The results of the study show that many factors influence the auditor's professional skepticism towards giving auditor opinion to the KAP TR such as ethics, competence, audit experience, audit situation, and auditor independence.The results of the study also showed that there were stages of the audit conducted to provide audit opinions. And also in the KAP TR there were also efforts made by the auditors to carry out the accuracy of giving opinions.