KEDUDUKAN SAKSI VERBALISAN SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM PEMERIKSAAN DI PERSIDANGAN BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN HAKIM NOMOR 150/PID.SUS/2018/PN.PMK. (STUDI PENGADILAN NEGERI PAMEKASAN)
| Main Author: | Permana, Bima Dwi |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45985/1/PENDAHULUAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45985/2/BAB%20I.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45985/3/BAB%20II.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45985/4/BAB%20III.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45985/5/BAB%20IV.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45985/6/LAMPIRAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45985/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Study of the Position of Witness Verbalisan as Evidence in the Examination at the Trial Based on Judge's Decision Number: 150 / Pid.SUS / 2018 / PN.Pmk. Verbal witnesses are part of the effort to prove in the Criminal Procedure Code, common in judicial practice, but the provisions are not clearly stipulated in the Law. Especially as has happened in criminal cases of narcotics on behalf of accused Samlawi. Which has been submitted in the verbalisan witness trial. There is a problem regarding the presence of the witness Verbalisan, namely the position of witness Verbalisan as an evidentiary effort in the trial and how the basis of the judge's consideration in examining the witness Verbalisan for the Judge's Decision Number: 150 / Pid.SUS / 2018 / PN.Pmk. the author gets answers to the problems that exist. First, the position of the testimony of the witness Verbalisan itself is free, namely the judge of the Judge is not bound to the value of the power contained in the testimony of the witness Verbalisan, and the Judge is free to judge the truth contained in the testimony of the witness Verbalisan. In the legal environment, witness Verbalisan is known as an investigator or investigator who is made a witness. For more details the testimony of the investigator at the trial was not a factual witness, the investigator was not a witness of the case. Witness Verbalisan is a medium for parties who revoke their statements at the investigation level. The two legal bases of the Judge presenting a verbalistic witness are MARI No. jurisprudence. 177K / Kr / 1965 which states that the recognition of Defendant's confession before the Police and Prosecutors is reviewed in relation to one another and can be used as a guide to determine the Defendant's fault. So that if the Defendant denies all contents of the BAP, a verbalisan witness is required to carry out the examination or croschek in the trial, so that if the Defendant denies all of the contents of the BAP that exist and all are proven deterrence of the defendant is illogical denial or in defense, then Judge can make as a clue to determine the defendant's fault