BUDAYA PLAGIARISME DI KALANGAN MAHASISWA (Studi Kasus pada Budaya Plagiarisme Penyelesaian Tugas Akademik di Kalangan Mahasiswa FISIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)
| Main Author: | HUTOMO HADI, HUDI |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/4489/1/BUDAYA_PLAGIARISME_DI_KALANGAN_MAHASISWA.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/4489/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Nowadays, Indonesian people have a tight relation with instant culture. Instant culture is the culture that wants to finish the job quickly, so it will be provided the instant result. A writer needs so many times to apply his/ her idea, but with the existence of this instant culture, they do not need working hard anymore. These plagiarists only need to copy others’ works. This instant culture almost infects all society level. In this research, researcher used imitation factor. It was one of the four factors for creating social interaction existence; they are autosuggestion, identification, and sympathetic factor. This was Gabriel Trade’s theory that was stated in DR. W.A. Gerungan 2000:58, it assumed that all of social life exactly based on imitation factor. Imitation factor’s role in social interaction also had the negative sides, when the imitated behavior was wrong or contravened. If all of the wrong behaviors were imitated by people, imitation process was be able to create errors. Moreover, because of the existence imitation process, the habitual of imitate the others’ works would rise without critics, and thinking habit would be obstructed. Plagiarism was one of negative imitative factor, because it was clear that plagiarism was wrong or contravened. Students rather to depend their paper content on the other’s work than did by themselves. Plagiarism behavior had been imitated by many people included students, it made a big mistake in university education sector. Students would be lazy to think and they would be hard to leave the plagiarism behavior. The purpose of this examination is to know why the students do the instant culture in finishing their academic final examination and how the effects of the instant culture in finishing academic final assignment for the students themselves. This study is expected to be able to be used theoretically as a confirmation and can be reapplied, also methodologically as information for another researcher for further research. This research was conducted in Faculty of Social and Political Science, UMM, because it was expected to represent students from all of faculties in UMM. The kind of research was qualitative, with case study approach. The collecting data techniques were observation, interview, and documentation. For analytical technique, the researcher based on proposition theory. The result of this research proved that instant culture behaviors in finishing academic final assignment especially in paper assignments, was still exist. It was proved by some informants’ confession and supported by Communication lecturer’s explanation. By the reason that there is no socialization about Plagiarism comprehension, the students still do the plagiarism. Even though there are some reasons why plagiarism still exist, they are: the other’s influences, lazy to do the assignments, there is wrong academic culture in campus.