ANALYTIC SCORING TECHNIQUE FOR PEER ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL AT ENGLISH DIPLOMA 3 UNIVERSITY OF MERDEKA MALANG
| Main Author: | Musrina, Musrina |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/42084/1/NASKAH.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/42084/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This study was intended to know whether or not the use of analytic scoring technique for speaking peer assessment could contribute significant gains on enhancing the students’ speaking skill compared to those assessed by holistic scoring technique. This research employed quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent (Pre-Test and Post-Test) control group design. The experimental research was conducted at University of Merdeka Malang specifically at English Diploma III. Two classes were chosen during the research as the experiment and the control group. Analytic scoring technique for speaking peer assessment was employed in experimental group. On the other way around, holistic scoring technique fo speaking peer assessment was employed in control group. Based on the result of independent sample t-test score, it was observed that t value (3.040) was higher than t table (2.01940). Thus, it showed that the alternative hypothesis was accepted. Seeing from sig.(2 tails) the significance level of the two groups was .004 less than .05. Hance, it can be concluded that the null hypothesis was rejected, and the alternative hypothesis was accepted. In other words, the students’ speaking skill of post test result in the experimental group significantly improved compared with the students’ speaking result in the control group assessed by peer assessment using holistic scoring technique.