Daftar Isi:
  • This research discusses about the dispute resolution efforts between endowments Nazir (case study of Class 1A Malang Court). This ruling provides a way for the parties to the dispute surrounding the endowments especially about anything that led to a dispute between land endowments and nazir how dispute resolution efforts between nazir if filed a lawsuit in Courts religion. The purpose of this research is to analyze the verdict the Court Religion of Malang Number 1547/Pdt. G/2017/PA MLG about disputes between endowments Nazir. So with the analysis, it can presumably be discovered and known the extent to which Malang Court religion ruling forces on the dispute resolution efforts endowments Nazir. To achieve the objectives of research there are several theories that are used i.e. theory maqa>s}hid syari>'ash-ah. Civil law objects theory and the theory of the taking of the verdict. The approach used is the juridical-normative approach. This research is normative law. The following research results, first of the factors that led to the dispute submitted to the endowments Nazir Court religion of malang that where the endowments Nazir equally look like to master the object land endowments and take the benefits from the results of the Waqf or endowments land management by way of unilateral. Both the juridical review, Endowments Law Number 41 Year 2004 against attempts of dispute resolution between nazir endowments by way of mediation process conducted in court religion.