Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri No.451/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Bar Yang Dikuatkan Oleh Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi No.48/PDT/2014/PT.DKI Dan Mahkamah Agung No.1572 K/Pdt/2015 Tentang Pembatalan Kontrak Berbahasa Asing Ditinjau Dari Prespektif Kepastian, Kemanfaatan Dan Keadilan Hukum
Main Author: | Hadi, Anggreni Aulia |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
Bahasa: | eng |
Terbitan: |
, 2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/39560/1/PENDAHULUAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/39560/2/BAB%20I.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/39560/3/BAB%20II.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/39560/4/BAB%20III.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/39560/5/BAB%20IV.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/39560/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Today the contract has an important role for the economy of a country. Given the signing of AFTA by Indonesia in 1992 and the swift flow of globalization into Indonesia, it is possible that the business contract is not only a business contract between Indonesian citizens but also business contracts with foreign nationals. A very urgent issue to examine in terms of contracts is the language of the contract. The obligation to use language in the agreement based on Law no. 24 of 2009 does not mention any sanctions or legal consequences for violation of the obligations of the use of Indonesian language in the agreement, and there is a fact that occurred on 31 August 2015, Supreme Court Decision No.1572 K / Pdt / 2015 has decided Loan Agreement between Nine AM Ltd. And PT Bangun Karya Pratama Lestari (BKPL) is null and void for violating the provisions of Law Number 24 Year 2009. So on this issue there is a fatal mistake by putting aside other legal considerations. A court decision should have three legal objectives. The court as a form of law enforcement, in enforcing the law there should be three elements that must be considered, namely: legal certainty, benefit and justice. All three elements must be compromise, should be paid attention proportionally balanced. The writing method is using normative juridical research. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Supreme Court Decision No.1572 K / Pdt / 2015 judging from the principle of legal certainty, justice, and expediency. The results of this study is the Supreme Court Decision No.1572 K / Pdt / 2015 has not met the principles of legal certainty, justice and expediency.