ANALISA UNSUR PASAR BERSANGKUTAN DAN UNSUR HARGA YANG HARUS DIBAYAR DALAM KASUS PERJANJIAN PENETAPAN HARGA SMS ANTAR OPERATOR (Suatu Studi Terhadap Putusan KPPU Nomor 26/KPPU-L/2007 Jo. Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 03/KPPU/2008/PN.JKT.PST Jo. Mahkamah Agung Nomor 9 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2016)
| Main Author: | Setiawan, Rocky Juniar Dwi |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/38845/1/PENAHULUAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/38845/2/BAB%20I.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/38845/3/BAB%20II.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/38845/4/BAB%20III.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/38845/5/BAB%20IV.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/38845/6/LAMPIRAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/38845/ |
Daftar Isi:
- The case stems from a community report to KPPU (Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition) that there is an SMS pricing agreement among operators. KPPU follow up and decided that 6 out of 9 operators are guilty of violating Article 5 regarding Price Pricing Law 5/1999. Out of the 6 operators, 5 operators were given administrative sanctions, then 5 operators filed an objection to the Central Jakarta District Court. PN Jakpus then won the operators on the grounds of non-fulfillment of two elements of Article 5, namely: the relevant market elements and elements of the price to be paid. KPPU then appealed to the Supreme Court and MA won the KPPU. This research takes the formulation of the problem as follows: 1. elements of Article 5 of Law no. 5 year 1999: how KPPU determines the elements of price fixing agreement in case of allegation of SMS pricing agreement among operators, how the judges of central jakarta court consider the elements of the pricing agreement in decision number 03 / KPPU / 2008 / Pn.Jkt. Pst, how the judges of the Supreme Court assessed the application of the relevant market elements and price elements to be paid by consumers against the decision of the central Jakarta court. 2. How to analyze the price elements to be paid and the relevant market elements in the case of pricing agreement among SMS operators. In answering the formulation of the problem used a Juridical Normative approach that is with data collection techniques in the form of the use of studies and libraries and the search for legal materials through internet browsing and create a description of the analysis. Central Jakarta District Court was wrong in determining the judge's judgment of the two elements of article 5 concerning the pricing agreement. KPPU has appropriate in determining the element of relevant market and price element which must be paid by the consumer is included in the element of the pricing agreement.