An Analysis On students’ error in using countable and uncountable nouns (a case study at the eight grade of SMP Muhammadiyah 35 Jakarta)
| Main Author: | Septiyana Ida Subekti |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | Syauki, Neneng Sunengsih |
| Format: | bachelorThesis |
| Bahasa: | ind |
| Terbitan: |
Jakarta : Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/44647 |
Daftar Isi:
- ix ; 101 Hal
- The objectives of the research were to describe the types of grammatical error and the causes of error in Using Countable and Uncountable Nouns that most commonly made by the eighth grade students of SMP 35 Muhammadiyah Kebayoran Lama Jakarta. The method used in this study was descriptive analysis or qualitative method by using formula: P = F/N. It was conducted as following procedures: collecting data from the students, classifying them into the grammatical errors in Using Countable and Uncountable Nouns, describing errors, interpreting data and the last concluding the result of the study. The data were collected through descriptive in Using Countable and Uncountable Nouns test by the theme based on the things which they are interested in. In this research, the writer took the purposive clustering sample technique with the total population was 58 students but she used only VIII A as the respondents with 28 students. The writer findings showed that the most common error which most students made is using addition; its frequency is 100 errors or 38.17%. Then the second commonest error is misformation with 94 or 35.88%. And the third error is 68 errors or 25.95% from omission. It can be concluded that most of the eighth grade students of SMP 35 Kebayoran Lama Jakarta got the wrong in addition, misformation, and omission in Using Countable and Uncountable Nouns. The reason why they made errors is because their overgeneralization. Besides, the teaching of these three aspects was not successfully done. It means that the most common error that the students made is derived from overgeneralization.