KEWENANGAN PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG MENGEMBALIKAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGERA PADA TAHAP PENUNTUTAN DI DALAM PERSIDANGAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
| Main Author: | ROSIDIN KARTONO, AHMAD |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/6695/1/KEWENANGAN%20PENUNTUT%20UMUM%20TERHADAP%20PELAKU%20TINDAK%20PIDANA%20KORUPSI%20YANG%20MENGEMBALIKAN%20KERUGIAN%20KEUANGAN%20NEGARA%20PADA%20TAHAP%20PENUNTUTAN%20DIDALAM%20PERSIDANGAN%20PENGADILAN%20TINDAK%20PIDANA%20KORUPSI.PDF https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/6695/ |
Daftar Isi:
- ABSTRACT THE PROSECUTORS’ AUTHORITY OVER THE GRAFT OFFENDERS WHO RETURNED THE HEARING STAGE IN THE CORRUPTION COURT By: Ahmad Rosidin Kartono The corruption offenders’ returning the corruption funds to the prosecutors which has empirically affected the charges raises the research questions: (1) how the authority of the prosecutors affects the recovery of state funds on trial and its implication upon the legal status of the evidence; (2) how the returning of the state fund may revoke the charges. Through the empirically normatif legal research with secondary legal approach consists of the primary, secondary, and ertiary data and deductive-inductive methods, it is discovered that returning the corruption funds can affect the charges and the evidence recovered in the court needs a legal status of the confiscation by prosecutors. The returned corruption money does not annul the committed offence in line with Article 4 he Law Number 31 year 1999 in conjunction with The Law number 20 year 2001 on The Eradication of Corruption. The research shows that returning the corruption money merely becomes the basis for judges to mitigate the sentence such as the case number PDS-06/Srg/04/2016 executed Serang’s Prosecution Office. Returning the money in the hearing stage only refers to The Memo from The Vice Attorney General for Special Crimes number Nomor B-2185/F/FL.1/10/2009 on October 15 2009 and the circular memo by The Attorney General number 003/A/02/2010, both of which become the legal basis for the prosecutors to charge. A revision is needed in the Law of Criminal Procedure to enable prosecutors to confiscate the evidence in corruption cases