ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP VONIS BEBAS PENGADILAN NEGERI PANDEGLANG KEPADA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN BIOTA LAUT DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1990 TENTANG KONSERVASI SUMBER DAYA ALAM HAYATI DAN EKOSISTEMNYA (Studi Putusan Nomor 245/PID.B/2014/PN.Pdl)
| Main Author: | ISMATUDDININA, ISMATUDDININA |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/1653/1/ANALISIS%20YURIDIS%20TERHADAP%20VONIS%20BEBAS%20PENGADILAN%20NEGERI%20PANDEGLANG%20KEPADA%20PELAKU%20TINDAK%20PIDANA%20PENCURIAN%20BIOTA%20LAUT%20DITINJAU%20DARI%20UNDANG-UNDANG%20NOMOR%205%20TAHUN%201990.PDF https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/1653/ https://fh.untirta.ac.id/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Ismatuddinina, NIM: 1111120915. Juridical Analysis of the Freedoms of the Pandeglang District Court to the Actors of Crime of Marine Biota Judging From Law Number 5 Of 1990 Concerning Conservation of Natural Resources And Their Ecosystems (Study Of Decision Number 245.PID.B/2014/PN.Pdl) The large number of illegal activities in the midst of the vastness of Indonesian waters has made efforts to protect, maintain and preserve biological natural resources and their ecosystems into actions that cannot be said to be easy. On the Ujung Kulon Peninsula, illegal activities to date continue to occur, even the intensity tends to increase. This was evidenced by the results of video surveillance cameras and the large number of lost memory cards, even though previously the Ujung Kulon National Park Hall along with village officials and the local police had made preventive efforts by giving guidance and making statements against those recorded by video cameras. Then in 2014 ago, the Ujung Kulon National Park Office Investigator accompanied by the Sumur Sector Police conducted legal proceedings against Misdan bin Bakri along with his two colleagues who were also caught, the actions of which were categorized as actions that were not in accordance with the utilization zone and other zones from the National Park. However, after the case entered the trial period, the Panel of Judges declared the free verdict on the defendants. Based on the chronology above, Decision Number: 245 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN.Pdl with Defendant Misdan bin Bakri is certainly interesting to study further and in depth regarding the ratio of decidendi or reasoning that was used as a foundation by the Pandeglang District Court Judge and whether the decision was already in line or not, then whether there are elements of trial by the mob (tried by mass) in the trial process of this case. After seeing the problems that the author will examine, the method used is a qualitative method. After the Researchers conducted a series of studies, it was concluded that the decision of the Panel of Judges which stated that Defendant Misdan bin Bakri was not legally proven and was convinced of guilt was a wrong decision. Because based on the analysis presented by the Researcher it indicates that the actions of Defendant Misdan bin Bakri have fulfilled the elements mentioned above. Keywords : Court Decisions, Theft Crimes, Marine Biota, National Parks.