Cover Image

THE FOREST CARBON MARKET IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS IN INDONESIA

Main Authors: Djaenudin, Deden, Lugina, Mega, Ramawati, Ramawati, Kartikasari, Galih, Indartik, Indartik, Pribadi, Mirna Aulia, Astana, Satria
Format: Article info application/pdf eJournal
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: Centre for Research and Development on Social, Economy, Policy and Climate Change , 2017
Subjects:
Carbon transaction
carbon credit
credit standard
registry agency
Transaksi karbon
kredit karbon
standar kredit
lembaga registri
Online Access: http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JAKK/article/view/1570
http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JAKK/article/view/1570/pdf
ctrlnum --ejournal.forda-mof.org-ejournal-litbang-index.php-index-oai?verb=ListSets:article-1570
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">THE FOREST CARBON MARKET IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS IN INDONESIA</title><title lang="id-ID">PERKEMBANGAN IMPLEMENTASI PASAR KARBON HUTAN DI INDONESIA</title><creator>Djaenudin, Deden</creator><creator>Lugina, Mega</creator><creator>Ramawati, Ramawati</creator><creator>Kartikasari, Galih</creator><creator>Indartik, Indartik</creator><creator>Pribadi, Mirna Aulia</creator><creator>Astana, Satria</creator><subject lang="en-US">Carbon transaction; carbon credit; credit standard; registry agency</subject><subject lang="id-ID">Transaksi karbon; kredit karbon; standar kredit; lembaga registri</subject><description lang="en-US">REDD+ carbon market can be an incentive for implementation ofREDD+ actors in the field. The facing problem is the high ofmarket uncertainty due to the unavailability ofcarbon transaction mechanism. The commitment oflocal government, relatively high as indicated by the formulation ofregulations that support the REDD+ implementation. Activity within REDD+ framework mainly is in order to maintain forest sustainability, revenue from carbon trading will be giving out additional benefit ifcarbon market occurred. Local government has not understood well on the carbon market procedure or its mechanism including carbon standard and methodology for producing carbon credit. Incentives for the achievement ofemissions reductions are more likely based on their roles in the sustainable forest management/improvement community's welfare instead of carbon credit. However, at the local level there are some voluntary forest carbon payment initiatives. The amount of proportionshouldconsidersharinginvestment costs, both between donors (buyers) and government. Registry agency need to be established in order to manage activities, oversee achievement of emission reduction, and facilitate the implementation of REDD+ in the field, and should have a task to set up a system ofincentives and disincentives in the management leakage risk and non-permanence.</description><description lang="id-ID">Pasar karbon REDD+ dapat menjadi insentifbagi pelaku implementasi REDD+ di lapangan. Permasalahan yang dihadapi adalah ketidakpastian pasar yang tinggi yang diakibatkan oleh belum tersedianya mekanisme transaksi karbon. Komitmen pemerintah daerah relatiftinggi yang ditunjukan dengan disusunnya peraturan pendukung implementasi REDD+. Kegiatan REDD+ adalah dalam rangka menjaga hutan lestari dan seandainya terjadi perdagangan karbon maka hasil perdagangan merupakan manfaat tambahan. Pemda belum mengetahui secara pasti tentang tatacara atau mekanisme pasar karbon, termasuk standar karbon dan metodologi untuk menghasilkan kredit karbon. Insentif yang diharapkan atas capaian penurunan emisi yang dihasilkan lebih didasarkan pada perannya dalam pengelolaan hutan lestari/peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat bukan berdasarkan harga karbon. Selain itu terdapat sejumlah inisiatifpembayaran karbon hutan secara sukarela. Besarnya proporsi perlu mempertimbangkan pangsa modal investasi yang telah dikeluarkan oleh pembeli dan pemerintah. Juga diperlukan lembaga registri yang mengelola kegiatan, capaian penurunan emisi, dan fasilitasi implementasi REDD+ di lapangan, dan mengatur sistem insentifdan disinsentif dalam pengelolaan resiko kebocoran dan ketidakpermanenan.</description><publisher lang="en-US">Centre for Research and Development on Social, Economy, Policy and Climate Change</publisher><contributor lang="en-US"/><contributor lang="id-ID"/><date>2017-02-07</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Other:</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JAKK/article/view/1570</identifier><identifier>10.20886/jakk.2016.13.3.159-172</identifier><source lang="en-US">Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan; Vol 13, No 3 (2016): Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan; 159-172</source><source>2502-6267</source><source>0216-0897</source><language>eng</language><relation>http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JAKK/article/view/1570/pdf</relation><rights lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</rights><recordID>--ejournal.forda-mof.org-ejournal-litbang-index.php-index-oai?verb=ListSets:article-1570</recordID></dc>
language eng
format Journal:Article
Journal
Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Other
Other:
File:application/pdf
File
Journal:eJournal
author Djaenudin, Deden
Lugina, Mega
Ramawati, Ramawati
Kartikasari, Galih
Indartik, Indartik
Pribadi, Mirna Aulia
Astana, Satria
title THE FOREST CARBON MARKET IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS IN INDONESIA
publisher Centre for Research and Development on Social, Economy, Policy and Climate Change
publishDate 2017
topic Carbon transaction
carbon credit
credit standard
registry agency
Transaksi karbon
kredit karbon
standar kredit
lembaga registri
url http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JAKK/article/view/1570
http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JAKK/article/view/1570/pdf
contents REDD+ carbon market can be an incentive for implementation ofREDD+ actors in the field. The facing problem is the high ofmarket uncertainty due to the unavailability ofcarbon transaction mechanism. The commitment oflocal government, relatively high as indicated by the formulation ofregulations that support the REDD+ implementation. Activity within REDD+ framework mainly is in order to maintain forest sustainability, revenue from carbon trading will be giving out additional benefit ifcarbon market occurred. Local government has not understood well on the carbon market procedure or its mechanism including carbon standard and methodology for producing carbon credit. Incentives for the achievement ofemissions reductions are more likely based on their roles in the sustainable forest management/improvement community's welfare instead of carbon credit. However, at the local level there are some voluntary forest carbon payment initiatives. The amount of proportionshouldconsidersharinginvestment costs, both between donors (buyers) and government. Registry agency need to be established in order to manage activities, oversee achievement of emission reduction, and facilitate the implementation of REDD+ in the field, and should have a task to set up a system ofincentives and disincentives in the management leakage risk and non-permanence.
Pasar karbon REDD+ dapat menjadi insentifbagi pelaku implementasi REDD+ di lapangan. Permasalahan yang dihadapi adalah ketidakpastian pasar yang tinggi yang diakibatkan oleh belum tersedianya mekanisme transaksi karbon. Komitmen pemerintah daerah relatiftinggi yang ditunjukan dengan disusunnya peraturan pendukung implementasi REDD+. Kegiatan REDD+ adalah dalam rangka menjaga hutan lestari dan seandainya terjadi perdagangan karbon maka hasil perdagangan merupakan manfaat tambahan. Pemda belum mengetahui secara pasti tentang tatacara atau mekanisme pasar karbon, termasuk standar karbon dan metodologi untuk menghasilkan kredit karbon. Insentif yang diharapkan atas capaian penurunan emisi yang dihasilkan lebih didasarkan pada perannya dalam pengelolaan hutan lestari/peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat bukan berdasarkan harga karbon. Selain itu terdapat sejumlah inisiatifpembayaran karbon hutan secara sukarela. Besarnya proporsi perlu mempertimbangkan pangsa modal investasi yang telah dikeluarkan oleh pembeli dan pemerintah. Juga diperlukan lembaga registri yang mengelola kegiatan, capaian penurunan emisi, dan fasilitasi implementasi REDD+ di lapangan, dan mengatur sistem insentifdan disinsentif dalam pengelolaan resiko kebocoran dan ketidakpermanenan.
id IOS3429.--ejournal.forda-mof.org-ejournal-litbang-index.php-index-oai?verb=ListSets:article-1570
institution Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia
institution_id 475
institution_type library:special
library
library Perpustakaan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI
library_id 121
collection Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research
repository_id 3429
subject_area Kehutanan
Lingkungan
Pertanian
city BOGOR
province JAWA BARAT
repoId IOS3429
first_indexed 2017-12-19T23:52:59Z
last_indexed 2018-03-10T01:25:59Z
recordtype dc
merged_child_boolean 1
_version_ 1800731608088576000
score 17.13294

Lihat Juga