Comparison Plyometric Rope Jumping With Different work Interval 10, 20, 30 Second Toward Agility
| Main Authors: | Awang Firmansyah, Gadis Meinar Sari, Achmad Widodo |
|---|---|
| Format: | BookSection PeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
Unesa University Press
, 2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://repository.unair.ac.id/94698/1/Comparison%20Plyometric%20rope%20jumping%20with%20different%20work%20interval%2010%2C%2020%2C%2030%20second%20toward%20agility_compressed.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/94698/2/Comparation%20plyometric%20rope%20jumping%20with%20different%20.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/94698/3/Comparison%20Plyometric%20rope%20jumping%20with%20different%20work%20interval%2010%2C%2020%2C%2030%20second%20toward%20agility.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/94698/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Introduction: Plyometric rope jumping is an easy and cheap training, and it can be done anywhere, also have an effect of physical performance. The goal of this research is to compare the effectiveness of plyometric rope jumping training with 10, 20 and 30 second-work interval toward speed and agility. Method: The total of subjects in this reserach was 33 students (trained) which would be divided into 3 groups of 10 second-work interval (n=11), 20 second-work interval (n=11), and 30 second-work interval (n=11). The measurement of agility's time was by using AFL test. This research used consecutive samplig method with pre-test-post-test control group design. Result: research has shown mean of age 19±0,91 years old, body mass index 22,05±2,46 kg/cm2, leg 85,09±4,98 cm. There were significant differences (p>0,05) in agility with 10 second-work interval group (0,001) while there were no significant different in work interval 20 and 30 seconds. In the ANOVA test there were significant differences in agility (0,000). Conclusion: Plyometric rope jumping increase agility with work interval 10 second while work interval 20 and 30 second can not increase agility.