A Small Note on Supreme Court Verdit in The Case of Russel Vince Who Claims The Similarity of Trademark with National Emblem
| Main Author: | Rahmi Jened |
|---|---|
| Format: | Proceeding PeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://repository.unair.ac.id/93740/1/2%20m%20A%20SMALL%20NOTE%20ON%20SUPREME%20COURT%20VERDIT_WITH%20NATIONAL%20EMBLEM.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/93740/2/2%20t%20A%20SMALL%20NOTE%20Hasil%20exclude.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/93740/3/2%20p%20Rahmi%2002-1-2-Kadept.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/93740/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This paper is based on research conducted by the author ,at a time when at the time was acted as an expert witness who testified in the trial of the case. There are some authors observe irregularities associated with the judicial process of the lawsuit ” Three Les” in Indonesia. First, the case was related to a previous lawsuit filed by SBS on “ Badak (Rhino) trademark cancellation by the former licensee three legs namely SBS. Second, the plaintiff did not have the right to sue ” Three Legs”trademark registration in Indonesia. Third, this case involves three (3) countries, namely Singapore as the country of origin Wen Ken Drug who trademark owner., Indonesia as a country issued certificate of “Three Legs” on behalf of WKD and Britain as a colonial state Isle of Man is a symbol of the Isle of Man became the object of dispute. The same case has never happened in Indonesia and even possibly in other countries. If the case is not completed correctly will be a bad precedent for trademark enforcement in Indonesia. Keywords: lawsuit, trademark, state symbol or emblem, Three Legs.