Strategi Nafkah Rumah Tangga Petani Sasak Persawahan dan Nelayan Sasak Pesisir di Lombok Timur
Main Author: | Adriana Monica Sahidu |
---|---|
Format: | Article PeerReviewed Book |
Bahasa: | eng |
Terbitan: |
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Airlangga
, 2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://repository.unair.ac.id/92999/5/Jurnal%20Penelitian%206%20-%20Inokulasi%20Mikroorganisme%20Pengurai%20Melalui%20Proses%20Biofermentasi.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/92999/1/Form%20PR%2C%20Validasi%20Karya%20Ilmiah%20-%203.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/92999/2/03.%20Strategi%20Naskah%20Rumah%20Tangga%20Petani%20Sasak%20Persawahan%20dan%20Nelayan%20Sasak%20Pesisir%20di%20Lombok%20Timur.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/92999/ http://journal.unair.ac.id/downloadfull/MKP8486-fcdd600904fullabstract.pdf |
Daftar Isi:
- Sasak people, developed livelihood system as a mechanism of adaptation to social change spaces pounding their life,in the midst of modernization either through the green revolution, revolution blue and Virginia tobacco interventiondevelopment, all of the consolidation of the new order of power thoroughly. Based on the background of the problems thathad been described, the aim of this study was to identify and analyze the strategic choice forms the livelihood of farmersand fi shermen Sasak people was analyzed through the use of post-positivism paradigm research. Types of quantitativeand qualitative researched. Quantitative data was needed to explain the level of income of farmers and fi shermen Sasakand their sources. While the qualitative data was necessary to explained social phenomena in terms of subjectivitytineliti. The experiment was conducted in two different communities that were located in coastal areas (coastal) andrice farming region (lowland) in East Lombok NTB. The researched concludes that for fi shermen households Sasak,production strategies were built by deployed labor households. For the spatial nature of institutional changes requiredby the fi shermen households to sustain the strategy that patron-client institution. As for the strategy of diversifi cation,household “srabutan” fi shermen built strategy and deployment of family labor and overseas migration. As for farmhouseholds, built production livelihood strategies. In the realm of diversifi cation, poor farming households built debtstrategy, manipulative, vertical cooperation with tobacoo industry companies, and migrated to Saudi Arabia.