The Differences of Learning Style and Students’ Creativity to Students’ Achievement in Dribbling the Ball in Playing Football of Seventh Grade Students of SMP Ar – Rahman Percut
| Main Authors: | Marpaung, Muammar Afif, Akhmad, Imran, Dewi, Rahma |
|---|---|
| Format: | Proceeding PeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | ind |
| Terbitan: |
Universitas Negeri Medan
, 2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/35336/1/COVER..pdf http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/35336/2/DAFTAR%20ISI.pdf http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/35336/3/ARTICLE.pdf http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/35336/ http://aisteel2018.unimed.ac.id |
Daftar Isi:
- This research was carried out at SMP Ar-Rahman Percut Sei Tuan in the even semester. The study was conducted in July 2018. The time of the study was held for one month or four weeks, with a frequency of 2 meetings a week, time for each meeting for 120 minutes, because it was adjusted to the hours of physical education at school. Research activities include testing of measuring instruments, preliminary tests, final treatment and tests. The conclusions in this study are: 1) Based on the results of variance analysis in the list of attachments, at the level of α = 0.05 then obtained Fh> Ft ie 5> 4.04. So that the overall conclusion can be drawn that there are differences in learning outcomes in dribbling in soccer games between inquiry learning models and NHT type cooperative learning models. Then continued with the tukey test in groups A1 and A2 where Qh = 4.5 and Qt = 3.79 and based on these results it can be concluded that there are differences in learning outcomes of dribbling in soccer games between inquiry learning models and NHT type cooperative learning models . 2) Based on the results of the analysis of variance, at the level of α = 0.05 then obtained Fh> Ft that is 13.88> 4.06. So that the overall conclusion can be drawn that there is an interaction between learning models with creativity towards learning outcomes of dribbling in soccer games. 3) Then continued with the tukey test in groups A2B2 and A1B2 where Qh = 3.57 and Qt = 2.92 and based on these results it can be concluded that the NHT type cooperative learning model is better than the inquiry learning model on learning outcomes leading to the material football in the student group of low creativity. 4)Then continued with the tukey test in groups A1B1 and A2B1 where Qh = 8.97 and Qt = 2.92 and based on these results it can be concluded that the inquiry learning model is better than the cooperative learning model NHT type on learning outcomes lead to the material football in a group of high creativity students.