ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF SOME AGRO FORESTRY SYSTEMS AND ITS POTENTIAL FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION SERVICE IN INDONESIA
Main Authors: | Ginoga, Kirsfianti L., Wulan, Y. Cahya, Lugina, Mega, Djaenudin, Deden |
---|---|
Format: | Article info eJournal |
Bahasa: | eng |
Terbitan: |
Secretariat of Forestry Research and Development Agency
, 2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/486 http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/486/470 |
ctrlnum |
--ejournal.forda-mof.org-ejournal-litbang-index.php-index-oai:article-486 |
---|---|
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF SOME AGRO FORESTRY SYSTEMS AND ITS POTENTIAL FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION SERVICE IN INDONESIA</title><creator>Ginoga, Kirsfianti L.</creator><creator>Wulan, Y. Cahya</creator><creator>Lugina, Mega</creator><creator>Djaenudin, Deden</creator><subject lang="en-US">Carbon sequestration, agroforestry, economic assessment</subject><description lang="en-US">This paper  provides  several alternatives  agroforestry  and plantation   systems  to consider  for carbon  sequestration  purposes.   It is indicated  that multicropping  of  coffee multistrata  or fruit trees such as mango,  duku and durian with timber or food and vegetable crops  produces  more benefits financially and economically compared  to monoculture  of tree plantation  such as albizia. The  former  system is more attractive in terms  of  return  to labour  and land.  However,  the later system produce  more carbon  and low cost of  carbon,  which is more potential  from the  buyers point  of  view: So there  is a trade-off   from  supply  and  demand   side  for  choosing   the  best alternatives   system.   Implication   of  these  are as follows:  (i) amount   and  price  of  product   is becoming  a key factors in determining  whether  a system is more  feasible  for selling of  product or carbon  trade, and (ii) there is   a need to create incentives  system for land  owners/producers if carbon  trade is a priority.</description><publisher lang="en-US">Secretariat of Forestry Research and Development Agency</publisher><contributor lang="en-US"/><date>2004-11-17</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Other:</type><type>Other:</type><identifier>http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/486</identifier><identifier>10.20886/ijfr.2004.1.1.31-49</identifier><source lang="en-US">Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research; Vol 1, No 1 (2004): Journal of Forestry Research; 31-49</source><source>2406-8195</source><source>2355-7079</source><language>eng</language><relation>http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/486/470</relation><rights lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2015 Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research</rights><recordID>--ejournal.forda-mof.org-ejournal-litbang-index.php-index-oai:article-486</recordID></dc>
|
language |
eng |
format |
Journal:Article Journal Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Other Other: Journal:eJournal |
author |
Ginoga, Kirsfianti L. Wulan, Y. Cahya Lugina, Mega Djaenudin, Deden |
title |
ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF SOME AGRO FORESTRY SYSTEMS AND ITS POTENTIAL FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION SERVICE IN INDONESIA |
publisher |
Secretariat of Forestry Research and Development Agency |
publishDate |
2004 |
topic |
Carbon sequestration agroforestry economic assessment |
url |
http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/486 http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/486/470 |
contents |
This paper provides several alternatives agroforestry and plantation systems to consider for carbon sequestration purposes. It is indicated that multicropping of coffee multistrata or fruit trees such as mango, duku and durian with timber or food and vegetable crops produces more benefits financially and economically compared to monoculture of tree plantation such as albizia. The former system is more attractive in terms of return to labour and land. However, the later system produce more carbon and low cost of carbon, which is more potential from the buyers point of view: So there is a trade-off from supply and demand side for choosing the best alternatives system. Implication of these are as follows: (i) amount and price of product is becoming a key factors in determining whether a system is more feasible for selling of product or carbon trade, and (ii) there is a need to create incentives system for land owners/producers if carbon trade is a priority. |
id |
IOS309.--ejournal.forda-mof.org-ejournal-litbang-index.php-index-oai:article-486 |
institution |
Badan Litbang Kehutanan |
institution_id |
104 |
institution_type |
library:special library |
library |
Perpustakaan Badan Litbang Kehutanan |
library_id |
15 |
collection |
Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research |
repository_id |
309 |
subject_area |
Biologi |
city |
JAKARTA SELATAN |
province |
DKI JAKARTA |
repoId |
IOS309 |
first_indexed |
2016-09-25T11:08:21Z |
last_indexed |
2017-02-25T09:27:24Z |
recordtype |
dc |
merged_child_boolean |
1 |
_version_ |
1800709098790977536 |
score |
17.13294 |