Informação institucionalizada e materializada como documento: caminhos e articulações conceituais
Main Author: | Rabello, Rodrigo |
---|---|
Format: | Journal PeerReviewed Book |
Bahasa: | eng |
Terbitan: |
UNESP
, 2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://eprints.rclis.org/41795/1/Rabello_2019_Inf.%20mat.%20inst.%20como%20doc.pdf http://eprints.rclis.org/41795/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This research poses questions regarding paths and how to make it possible to build concepts on information materiality and institu- tionality as phenomena concerning transforming object into document. It aims to: a) build fundaments, b) synthetize paths to investi- gate phenomena; and c) build a framework of conceptual articulations on information materialized and institutionalized as document. This was achieved by means of review of literature; establishing interdisciplinary; and epistemological and political links concerning documentation and information sciences. The research employed, in addition, Imre Lakatos’ theoretical-methodological elements as subsidies for the proposition of an investigation program, structuring the planning and articulation of theoretical-methodological choices. Counting on contributions from works by Weber, Habermas, Bourdieu, and Foucault, such choices pass through fundaments of “claims to validation, discursive practices, and political horizons;” of “sociocultural, symbolic-bureaucratic and political materiali- ty of information;” of “object-support and materiality in informational actions and practices;” and of “epistemological and political contexts: materiality, institutionality and representation.” Conceptual articulations and paths culminated in the core of the program, from which one can observe document as informational value attributed to the object, i.e. a product of signification or of the function attributed to a thing in a given institutionality. Thus, documental materiality transcends physicality of information on a support, as every document: (a) represents something and can be represented; and (b) is a symbolic expression of power/knowledge. Finally, the document is a product of social practices and actions, defined by institutionalities of information with access and conditions to act conditioned by perspectives of materiality.