Prácticas de publicación, percepciones y valoraciones en torno al Acceso Abierto de los investigadores de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
| Main Authors: | Solaro, Gicelt Nadya, Lamberti, Alicia María |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis PeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | es |
| Terbitan: |
, 2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.rclis.org/28942/1/TESIS.%20SOLARO%20y%20LAMBERTI.%20Noviembre%202015.pdf http://eprints.rclis.org/28942/ |
Daftar Isi:
- In this work it is presented a study about the practices, perceptions and values possessed by researchers at the Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades (FFyH) of the Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC) in relation to the mode of scientific publishing in open access (OA). This new paradigm of communication, which was supported by the international scientific community, was born with the technological advances that allow editing and electronic distribution of their articles using the Internet and also due to the major economic barriers imposed by the corporation publishers to access this type of specialized information. In order to develop this work four research centers were selected: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad (CIECS), Instituto de Antropología de Córdoba (IDACOR) Instituto de Humanidades (IDH) and Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades (CIFFyH). All of these belong to the FFyH. Through an exploratory study and using the survey online, it was investigated dissemination practices, perception and values that these scientists give to OA publications. It was also studied the factors, difficulties and concerns about the choice of journals where they prefer to publish the result of their investigations. The use of OA journals, institutional repositories and journals portal at UNC as source of information was researched and also the reasons and motives that influence on the choice of model of publications. The use, the reasons and the choice were studied in order to determine the predispositions or resistance the FFyH researchers regarding the publication in OA. The results were analyzed and compared with other national and international studies on the subject of OA. It can be said that this work reached to similar conclusions.