A Comparative Assessment of Answer Quality on Four Question Answering Sites
| Main Author: | Shachaf, Pnina |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal PeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
Sage Publishing
, 2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.rclis.org/20328/1/Comparative%20Assessment%20on%20Answer%20Quality%2C%202011.pdf http://eprints.rclis.org/20328/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Question answering (Q&A) sites, where communities of volunteers answer questions, may provide faster, cheaper, and better services than traditional institutions. However, like other Web 2.0 platforms, user-created content raises concerns about information quality. At the same time, Q&A sites may provide answers of different quality because they have different communities and technological platforms. This paper compares answer quality on four Q&A sites: Askville, WikiAnswers, Wikipedia Reference Desk, and Yahoo! Answers. Findings indicate that: 1) the use of similar collaborative processes on these sites results in a wide range of outcomes. Significant differences in answer accuracy, completeness, and verifiability were found; 2) answer multiplication does not always result in better information. Answer multiplication yields more complete and verifiable answers but does not result in higher accuracy levels; and 3) a Q&A site’s popularity does not correlate with its answer quality, on all three measures.