Los formatos bibliográficos usados en bibliotecas argentinas y sus implicaciones para la descripción de contenido en catálogos en línea
| Main Authors: | Martínez, Ana María, Ramón, Susana |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal PeerReviewed application/pdf |
| Bahasa: | es |
| Terbitan: |
Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas, INIBI. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
, 1999
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.rclis.org/16902/1/n01a02.pdf http://eprints.rclis.org/16902/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Four bibliographic formats, broadly used in argentine libraries (CEPAL. FOCAD, BIBUN, and SIGEBI), are compared with USMARC and UNIMARC in order to assess their compliance with the recommendations for improvement of subject searches in on-line catalogs, and their possibilities for information exchange with other systems. We conclude that the formats used in Argentina show deficiencies in the treatment of subject headings. Identifiers, non-controlled terms, and form/genre terms, having no complementary authority and classification data formats In addition, several differences in the number and repeatibility of subfields may difficult the Information exchange with other national and international systems.