L'Open Access come strategia per la valutazione delle produzioni intellettuali
| Main Author: | De Robbio, Antonella |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | Bogliolo, Domenico, Gargiulo, Paola |
| Format: | BookSection PeerReviewed application/pdf |
| Bahasa: | it |
| Terbitan: |
Ledizioni
, 2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.rclis.org/14186/1/derobbio.pdf http://eprints.rclis.org/14186/ |
Daftar Isi:
- The evaluation of research in Italy have recently been considered as a strategy part of the governance system of universities and research institutions, a social process where organizational models, cultural and economic factors may affect the terms and approaches. For the purposes of measuring the impact of the work of an author within the scientific community, it is essential to begin to experiment bibliometric techniques along with a new development of new and "open" ways to meet the sophisticated requirements of a proper evaluation of the intellectual productions of research. For this reason, in the 2007 national Open Access Commission for Libraries CRUI has worked to draft recommendations (by way distribution to the Rectors) on Open Access and the evaluation of the products of scientific research. One variable to consider is the disciplinary matters and every community has its own habits and criteria established in the tradition. The differences between the sciences "hard" sciences and the humanities scientometric analysis are evident. Open Access opens new frontiers, not only in the development of next-generation bibliometric indicators focused on the individual worker or at least the author rather than the periodical, but especially in terms of infrastructure useful for a wide-ranging impact assessment. Some recent projects are focusing on the measurement of resources within the open archives and open access resources by providing set of tools for assessing the intellectual productions of scientific communication not limited to the narrow scope of the revised payment.