Los archivos y las bibliotecas ante la preservación digital: ¿un sólo enfoque?
Main Author: | Termens, Miquel |
---|---|
Format: | Proceeding PeerReviewed application/pdf |
Bahasa: | es |
Terbitan: |
SEDIC
, 2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://eprints.rclis.org/13883/1/XIJGI-Termens.pdf http://eprints.rclis.org/13883/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Research and development in digital preservation are being undertaken interchangeably in archives and libraries in different countries. The two types of institutions are apparently using the same standards and the same tools to arrive at similar solutions, but further analysis shows that there are wide differences. Are these differences historical heritage of the disagreements between archives and libraries or are the result of new objective differences? This communication is intended to answer this mystery. From a review of the literature on digital preservation and ongoing projects at the international level to detect commonalities and differences that presents the challenge of digital preservation in archives and libraries. A target level, we move to large differences in the perception of the concept of preservation "long term", that the urgency of digital preservation is seen in a very different and unequal weights given to the concepts of access, authenticity , recovery and description, among others. Differences remain on key issues currently under discussion internationally as the role of metadata, which outlines use of process control and document life to preserve the significant features. Organizationally, the pioneering institutions currently deploying solutions are articulated differently in the two policy areas and also vary in their ability to relate to other institutions or departments. In terms of workload and computing requirements can be different situations and not always in the same direction. If we focus on professionals, archivists and librarians identify different dangers and opportunities in digital document management and preservation. Knowing all these differences and similarities should allow each group would best the other and see the benefits of working with him on shared goals.