Alcune considerazioni sulla valutazione della ricerca nelle scienze umane
| Main Author: | Cassella, Maria |
|---|---|
| Format: | Proceeding NonPeerReviewed application/pdf |
| Bahasa: | it |
| Terbitan: |
, 2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.rclis.org/13208/1/bologna_3ver.pdf http://eprints.rclis.org/13208/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Research assessment in the Humanities does not follow the STM paradigm: journals are not the main research output, peer-review is not widespread, Impact Factor is scarcely adopted. Notwithstanding quality control is becoming important in the Humanities too. Ex-post evaluation through overlay journals and Web 2.0 social tools may also be combined or used as an alternative to traditional peer-review to evaluate research in the Humanities. As far as the quantitative assessment is regarded new bibliometric indicators should be conceived for the Humanities. Author describes also very briefly the Usage Factor UKSG project, The European Reference Index for Humanities (ERIH) and the Publisher and Institutional Repository Usage Statistics (PIRUS) project.