PENGENAAN SANKSI PIDANA PEMALSUAN AKTA NOTARISDALAM PRAKTEK PEMBUATAN AKTA (STUDI KASUS PERKARA NO. 49/Pid.B/2005/PN.Mgl DI PENGADILAN NEGERI MAGELANG)
| Main Authors: | , JUWAIRIAH, , Kunthoro Basuki, SH., M.Hum., |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/97489/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54214 |
Daftar Isi:
- This studyput more emphasis on case studies of criminal case No. : 49/Pid.B/2005/PN.Mgl in MagelangDistrict Court. In which, the case is so complex causing conflicts of interest to many parties, including Notary,who charged an shall be liable to deed infrigement practice. The research is the juridical normative legal research that under the laws, has occurred or been done by the Judge inhis ruling on case in court. Source data were secondary data and for the accuracy of the data was conducted through interviews with the concerned parties who know or involved with the suit case. The research found none offense of Notary as a principal factor of deed counterfeiting. The law penalties to the Notary shall be liable for imprisonment for five years or more based on court decisions with permanent legal force, and the Notary will be subject to administrative sanctions in accordance with the provisions of Article 13 UUJN. A law penalties which penalizing the Notary with formal reasons is not going to cancel the formal aspects of Notary deed as the object of criminal cases. Deed shall remain valid until a court decision is legally binding to the contrary. Based on the above case, to parties those deny or repudiation of the formal aspects of the Notary deed can do so by referring to Article 84 UUJN by filling a civil action in the district court.