WAARMEKING ATAS KESIMPULAN KERAPATAN ADAT NAGARI (KAN) DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HARATO PUSAKO DI NAGARI LAREH NAN PANJANGKOTA PADANG PANJANG
| Main Authors: | , Kartika Mesa, , Agus Sudaryanto, S.H., M.Si. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/90926/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=53664 |
Daftar Isi:
- The research aims to find out the role of KAN in resolving a lawsuit and to find out the law power to the conclusion of resolving the lawsuit of KAN had being waarmerking at Notary office. The problems studied in this research is the KAN role in resolving the lawsuit of harato pusoko, motive of KAN did the waarmerking and how does the process of waarmerking conducted by Notary and law status from underhand letter had being waarmerking by notary. Approach used in this research is empirical juridical approach or socio legal research that is research conducted to obtain primary data related to concerns in field, in connection to applied law rule. This research is conducted through literature and field research. Technique for collecting data is by using purposive sampling method. Data obtained from research finding is qualitatively analyzed then being described. The research findings showed that KAN role in resolving the lawsuit of harato pusoko was as mediator conducted through discussion to achieve agreement. KAN motive did waarmerking was there was appeal from parties in order to get more legal security than underhand letter and to avoid default. Waarmerking process conducted by notary to conclusion of KAN in resolving a lawsuit was through brought the underhand letter to notary office then it given number and noted into special book of notary and signed by notary. The law power of underhand letter which had being waarmerking by KAN of Lareh Nan Panjang according to State Court of Padang Panjang could be a legal proof and that the letter can be legal evidence and this evidence is stronger than underhand letter because the waarmerking letter is guarantee by notarist. Where the letter have been a number and noting in notarist special book.