FAKTOR-FAKTOR PEMAKAIAN KONTRASEPSI PADA RUMAH TANGGA MISKIN DI INDONESIA (ANALISIS DATA SDKI 2007)
| Main Authors: | , IWAN DWI ANTORO, S.PD, , Prof. Dr. Muhadjir Darwin, M.PA |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/90536/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=52852 |
Daftar Isi:
- The 1997 economic crises occured in 1997 affecting on the ability people to pay for contraceptive. The dramatic decreased of peopleâ��s ability in purchasing the contraceptive was predicted as one of the factors which causes the declining of the achivement of an active family planning participants, which influenced on the achievement of the National Family Planning Board to achieved the 75% of active participants targetted. To solved the problems, the Government issued a policy of family planning programs which gives priority for improving services for the poor householdsthrough improved access and expansion of services funded by Poor Family Health Insurance program (HIP). Recently, not all the poor have accessibily for the family planning services, particularly free contraceptives. As consequence, it has resulted in lack of Contraceptive Prevalency Ratio (CPR) among couples of childbearing age (EFA) on poor households. Although the national average of modern contraceptive use increased, but the use of contraceptive in poor remains low. Based on the 2007 Indonesia Demographic Health Survey (IDHS) datasets, there were a number of poor households did not use contraceptive, eventhough the government provided free of charge of contraceptive for all the poor. Therefore, It is necessary to identify factor influencing the contraceptive use among the poor in Indonesia. This study was carried out to analyze the statistical factors of contraceptive use in poor household in Indonesia. The research project was based on the 2007 Indonesia Demographic Health Survey (IDHS) datasets. The unit analysis of this study was poor women who were married, not getting pregnant, fertile did not want more children, fertile want children â�¥ 2 years, amenorrhea want children â�¥ 2 years and amenorrhea did not want more children.Total sample of this study was 6174 respondents. Statistical analyses used was chi square (Ï� Â2) to examine the differences between the independent variables and dependent variable. The result of the bivariate analysis revealed that there were significant differences in contraceptive use in poor households based on predisposing factors, the factors supporting and motivating factor. Poor women who did not use contraception was greater in women having low of family planning knowledge, not exposed to family planning information, not available contraceptive choice and wife was the decisionmakers in the family. Short term hormonal methods use was greater among women who have accessibility of family planning services and choosing private services, while long term methods use was greater among women who agree to family planning programs, affordable access to sources of contraceptive services, gaining the support of family planning providers/health and decision for contraceptive use was discussed between husband and wife.