ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU) PERKARA NOMOR 05/KPPU-L/2010 DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT
| Main Authors: | , Aldian Syahreza Nasution, SH, , Sularto. S.H. C.N. M.Hum. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/90345/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=53192 |
Daftar Isi:
- The desire to have antitrust laws in Indonesia has for years been the talk of the public, members of the legislature (parliament) and political parties. Over the years, the government of Soeharto, initiatives, ideas, or will have been blocked by the regime at that time due to conflict with the interests of Soeharto's cronies. Finally, an antimonopoly law and competition has been approved and enacted by Parliament since March 5, 1999. This study aims to analyze the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Decision (KPPU) Case Number 05/KPPU-L/2010 about the conspiracy and discrimination. Conspiracies are growing very fast and diverse. Tender conspiracy is one of them and it causes monopoly and unfair business competition. The case of conspiracy set forth in Article 22 Antimonopoly Law. Discrimination is also the cause of monopoly and unfair business competition, which is set forth in Article 19 letter d Antimonopoly Act. Facts show that the procurement of goods / services tinged effort unhealthy behaviors. Conspiracy and discrimination are a form of monopoly and unfair competition behaviors by the business actors.