TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI PERJANJIAN TERAPETIK PADA RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DARURAT DR. MOEWARDI DI SURAKARTA
| Main Authors: | , Mahmud, , Prof. Dr. Abdul Ghofur Anshori, S.H., M.H. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/88432/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=50610 |
Daftar Isi:
- The purpose of this research are: to determine whether the juridical form of therapeutic agreement between doctors and patients in accordance with the norms already provide a balance of rights and obligations of the parties, and also to examine how the legal protection of the parties between doctors and patients in the therapeutic contract. The author do with research methods, both normative literature by assessing the material which is a secondary material, hereinafter referred to as library research. Data obtained from research literature covering primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary as well as field research which is a study done by examining directly to the location of the research to get the materials or data that supports this writing, and the last study was conducted by interviewing directly to the resource. The results of " Judicial Review About Therapeutic Agreement On General Hospital Emergency Dr. Moewardi In Surakarta" seen from the standard approval of medical action shows a lot of formal judicial shortcomings, where witness of the agreement is only one course of medical action of the hospital where doctors work, there should be two witnesses from both sides. In the approval of medical measures that have been there at the General Hospital Emergency Dr. Moewardi Surakarta, is not the unilateral will of the parties, in this case can not be said to be an appropriate agreement in the Civil Code, so that in the statement of approval of medical acts is difficult to apply sanctions against a doctor who has done such medical measures. Legal protections between doctors and patients in therapeutic agreements have not provided guarantees against losses that occur after a medical act performed. This is because the the object of agreement between doctors and patients are seeking healing of treatment (inspanning verbintenis) not guarantee the recovery treatment (resultate verbintenis). In the future we need a therapeutic agreement that can provide a balance of rights and obligations and legal protection for doctors and patients