Energy Utilization, VFA, and A/P Ratio of KAcang Goat Fed Total Mixed Ration Containing Different Treatments of Soybean Meal
| Main Authors: | Kustantinah, Kustantinah, Budisatria, I Gede Suparta, Rusman, Rusman, Adiwinarti, Retno |
|---|---|
| Format: | Proceeding PeerReviewed application/pdf |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/273983/1/ANI-NUE%202017.pdf https://repository.ugm.ac.id/273983/7/ANI-NUE%20sertifikat.pdf https://repository.ugm.ac.id/273983/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This study was focused on the energy utilization, volatile fatty acids (VFA), and A/P ratio of Kacang goat fed TMR containing different treatments of soybean meal. Fourteen yearling Kacang bucks, 17.6±1.2 kg were arranged in completely randomized design consisted of 3 different treatments those were SBM control (n=5): untreated SBM; SBM50 (n=5): 50% untreated SBM + 50% formaldehyde-protected SBM; SBM100 (n=4): 100% formaldehydeprotected SBM. The TMR consisted of 30% Pennisetum purpureum, 30% gliricidia leaves, 19.2% cassava waste product, 13.8% wheat bran, 7% SBM, 1% mineral mix were mixed containing 14-15% crude protein and 56-60% TDN. The average daily gain (ADG) during 70 days weighed weekly was calculated using linear regression. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance using the SPSS statistics software version 19. The energy intake and digestible energy (DE) of SBM control (13.0 MJ and 7.7 MJ) were higher than those of SBM50 (10.2 MJ and 5.8 MJ), but they were relatively the same as SBM100 (11.3 MJ and 6.7 MJ). Energy conversion ratio (energy intake, DE, and metabolizable energy/ME) also had the same pattern. Digestible energy (% intake energy), fecal, urine, methane energy loss (MJ), and ME were similar between the treatments. Intake, digested, and metabolizable energy (MJ/kg BW 0.75) were also the same between the treatments. Total VFA and A/P ratio before feeding was also similar between the treatments. In fact, the A/P ratio at 3 hours and 6 hours of SBM control were higher than those of SBM50, but they were relatively the same as SBM100. It can be concluded that energy utilization of untreated SBM was better than those of 50% formaldehyde-protected SBM, but it was similar to those of SBM100. The control group had A/P ratio that was higher than SBM50 group. In fact, total VFA was similar between the treatments