PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DENGAN SISTEM INFORMASI ADMINISTRASI PENGADILAN AGAMA (SIADPA) DI PENGADILAN AGAMA SLEMAN
| Main Authors: | , M. Kamal S., SH, , Dr. Sutanto, S.H., M.S. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/133949/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=74868 |
Daftar Isi:
- This research aimed to observe the settlement of case with Administration Information System of Religion Court (Siadpa) and observe the judgment with Siadpa still referred to the court session official report in the Religion Court of Sleman The method used in this law study was normative empirical law research. In the literature and normative law research was focused on the literature or secondary data, consisted of primary and secondary and tertiary law data. In the empirical law research, the authors take interview with informant from the Religion Court of Sleman to obtain the deepest description upon the judgment to be the object of study. Settlement the case in the Religion Court of Sleman by 2006 and 2007 using Administration Information System of religion Court (siadpa) was apparently faster. From 2163 cases received by the Religion Court of Sleman in fact can be settled 1902 cases or 87.93% or still remains 12.07%, and it was included the remaining of cases in 2005. If the remaining of cases was not included the remaining of cases in period 2006 and 2007 just 43 cases of 1695 cases which received by 2006 and 2007, this means the cases not settled was only 2.54% and 97.46% can be settled. The settlement of cases with Administration Information System of Religion Court (Siadpa) in the religion Court of Sleman become faster from administration point and facilitate the community to get information from the Religion Court of Sleman. The speed has developed to another course, viz., make judgment with using Siadpa that in fact has negative impact to the judgment which no more referred to the court session official report, since there was standardizing in the cases judgment that most common that is the divorce case, whereas each the cases is definitely different although appear the same.