Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dalam Putusan KPPU (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Hak Siar Liga Inggris oleh Astro Group)

Main Authors: , ESTAFIRANI KAMAHAYANI, , Drs. Paripurna, S.H., M.Hum., LL.M.
Format: Thesis NonPeerReviewed
Terbitan: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada , 2014
Subjects:
ETD
Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/131529/
http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=72025
ctrlnum 131529
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><relation>https://repository.ugm.ac.id/131529/</relation><title>Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dalam Putusan KPPU (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Hak Siar Liga Inggris oleh Astro Group)</title><creator>, ESTAFIRANI KAMAHAYANI</creator><creator>, Drs. Paripurna, S.H., M.Hum., LL.M.</creator><subject>ETD</subject><description>One of the most favorite football competitions watched by Indonesian people is the English Premier League. In the 2007-2010 season, the subscription TV operator, known under the trademark \"Astro\" took over the broadcast Barclays Premier League (BPL). In Indonesia, over the past few years to 2006, EPL (English Premier League) broadcast and can be enjoyed either through terrestrial free to air television and subscription television. When Astro has over BPL broadcasting rights, all TV stations both terrestrial and subscription couldn&#xE2;&#xFFFD;&#xFFFD;t broadcast the matches of EPL again in Indonesia. Around September 2008, Indovision along with PT. Indosat Mega Media (IM2) and PT. Indonusa Telemedia (Telkomvision) submitted a report to the Commission (KPPU) over alleged violations of anti-competitive actions undertaken by Astro. Indovision&#xE2;&#xFFFD;&#xFFFD;s report to the Commission action is motivated by ESPN Star Sports stop the supply of EPL broadcast to pay-TV operator/subscribe and terrestrial TV in Indonesia. ESPN Star Sports as EPL broadcast rights holders for the Indonesian region at all never even notify or submit an official explanation to the subscription television provider in Indonesia about the existence of a tender for the rights to broadcast EPL matches for the 2007-2010 match season. This case has been examined and decided upon by the Commission, but Indovision as the complainant appealed against the decision of the Commission. Indovision rejected objections raised by the West Jakarta District Court on the grounds do not meet the legal standing to appeal. This Legal Research aims to analyze the reasons behind the legal standing of the reporting entrepreneurs couldn&#xE2;&#xFFFD;&#xFFFD;t raise objections to the decisions. In addressing the problems, this Research uses library research methodology. Based on the Research, the result is a reporter entrepreneurs in competition cases is not entitled to file an objection against the decision of the Commission due to the decision handed down by the Commission contain matters or legal consequences borne only by the reported party. Reporting parties here will not get the consequences and impacts associated directly with the ruling of the Commission.</description><publisher>[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada</publisher><date>2014</date><type>Thesis:Thesis</type><type>PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed</type><identifier> , ESTAFIRANI KAMAHAYANI and , Drs. Paripurna, S.H., M.Hum., LL.M. (2014) Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dalam Putusan KPPU (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Hak Siar Liga Inggris oleh Astro Group). UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. </identifier><relation>http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&amp;sub=PenelitianDetail&amp;act=view&amp;typ=html&amp;buku_id=72025</relation><recordID>131529</recordID></dc>
format Thesis:Thesis
Thesis
PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed
PeerReview
author , ESTAFIRANI KAMAHAYANI
, Drs. Paripurna, S.H., M.Hum., LL.M.
title Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dalam Putusan KPPU (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Hak Siar Liga Inggris oleh Astro Group)
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
publishDate 2014
topic ETD
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/131529/
http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=72025
contents One of the most favorite football competitions watched by Indonesian people is the English Premier League. In the 2007-2010 season, the subscription TV operator, known under the trademark \"Astro\" took over the broadcast Barclays Premier League (BPL). In Indonesia, over the past few years to 2006, EPL (English Premier League) broadcast and can be enjoyed either through terrestrial free to air television and subscription television. When Astro has over BPL broadcasting rights, all TV stations both terrestrial and subscription couldn�t broadcast the matches of EPL again in Indonesia. Around September 2008, Indovision along with PT. Indosat Mega Media (IM2) and PT. Indonusa Telemedia (Telkomvision) submitted a report to the Commission (KPPU) over alleged violations of anti-competitive actions undertaken by Astro. Indovision�s report to the Commission action is motivated by ESPN Star Sports stop the supply of EPL broadcast to pay-TV operator/subscribe and terrestrial TV in Indonesia. ESPN Star Sports as EPL broadcast rights holders for the Indonesian region at all never even notify or submit an official explanation to the subscription television provider in Indonesia about the existence of a tender for the rights to broadcast EPL matches for the 2007-2010 match season. This case has been examined and decided upon by the Commission, but Indovision as the complainant appealed against the decision of the Commission. Indovision rejected objections raised by the West Jakarta District Court on the grounds do not meet the legal standing to appeal. This Legal Research aims to analyze the reasons behind the legal standing of the reporting entrepreneurs couldn�t raise objections to the decisions. In addressing the problems, this Research uses library research methodology. Based on the Research, the result is a reporter entrepreneurs in competition cases is not entitled to file an objection against the decision of the Commission due to the decision handed down by the Commission contain matters or legal consequences borne only by the reported party. Reporting parties here will not get the consequences and impacts associated directly with the ruling of the Commission.
id IOS2744.131529
institution Universitas Gadjah Mada
institution_id 19
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Pusat Universitas Gadjah Mada
library_id 488
collection UGM Repository
repository_id 2744
subject_area Karya Umum
city SLEMAN
province DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA
repoId IOS2744
first_indexed 2016-09-14T18:34:11Z
last_indexed 2016-09-22T21:48:19Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1765816548552867840
score 17.538404